kaeurennetwo

I am grateful because although the online community bullied me and didn't show signs of remorse, I am still alive, breathing fresh air.

I may not like others who are compromising my respect and dignity as a person.

My past posts, which the users are consistently bringing up to bring me down despite warnings against bullying and harassment, are clear signs and evidence that support my claim: no one likes me.

Apologies and accountability are processes. I can see that there are many people who are bringing me down; it should be more than just saying sorry. It should involve change for the better, recognizing their patterns, and not taking advantage of people's flaws and vulnerabilities for their own gain.

What's the latest published i••••e?

How many watts is the fast charge for the i••••e 16 series?

i••••es will never allow me to compare them with A•••••d phones.

A•••e seems to be focusing on optimization from blueprints, design, architecture, hardware, to software, end to end. A•••••d phones have so many denominations.

No matter how many A•••••d phones try to overtake A•••e, A•••e is the most purchased phone in the world.

That's why I, as an A•••••d user, must feel bad for what I bought with cash, with no carrier lock-ins and fully paid specifications.

This is what A•••e wants: to make non-A•••e users feel bad. Like me. They win by doing this.

They win in profits. But it's my power to question their approach to profits. They cooperate with carriers and rely on loan-based sales; they're exploring subscriptions if it's possible to get i••••es, and of course, they are using riba, punishing those who can't pay for it. Yeah, I feel bad for not using i••••es. This is what they win in—psychologically convincing those who don't use i••••es.

Sarawak-one of Malaysia’s founding partners-is asserting its autonomy

1. Petros
   – Sarawak established Petroleum Sarawak Berhad (Petros) in 2017 as its own oil and gas company, taking charge of the state’s petroleum resources and enforcing state-level licensing, which strengthens Sarawak’s control over its natural wealth.

2. S Pay Global
   – Launched as Sarawak Pay in 2017 and now known as S Pay Global, this state-owned e-wallet promotes a cashless economy and digital inclusivity, with widespread adoption among Sarawakians and integration into state services.

3. DBOS
   – The Development Bank of Sarawak (DBOS), founded in 2017, channels state revenues into strategic projects like infrastructure and green initiatives, enabling Sarawak to independently finance its development priorities.

4. AirBorneo
   – In 2025, Sarawak acquired and rebranded MASwings as AirBorneo, becoming the first Malaysian state to own an airline-improving regional connectivity and asserting control over its transport links.

5. Native Customary Rights – Sarawak’s Land Code, especially Section 5(2), recognizes and protects Native Customary Rights (NCR) over land, empowering indigenous communities and ensuring land matters are governed by state laws and authorities.

Understanding the Truth About Singapore's Exit from Malaysia

Many people today still believe that Singapore was simply kicked out of Malaysia in 1965, like it was garbage or unwanted. This is a very common misunderstanding. The truth is more complicated and needs to be explained clearly, especially for those who care about history and fairness.

In 1963, Malaysia was formed with four main partners: Malaya, Singapore, Sabah (then North Borneo), and Sarawak. They signed the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) to create the new country. All four had equal importance as founding members. It was not just Malaya making decisions alone.

Just two years later, in 1965, Singapore left the federation. Many people believe Malaysia kicked Singapore out. This is partly true but not fully correct. In public, the Malaysian government announced that Parliament voted to remove Singapore. But behind the scenes, both leaders—Tunku Abdul Rahman from Malaysia and Lee Kuan Yew from Singapore—had already discussed and agreed on this decision. They signed a treaty called the Independence of Singapore Agreement 1965. This shows it was not a one-sided action, but a mutual agreement.

However, this agreement was only signed by the Malaysian federal government (dominated by Peninsular Malaysia) and Singapore. Sabah and Sarawak were not included in the talks or decision. This is a serious matter. They were part of MA63 and helped build Malaysia, but were not respected in this big change. When Singapore left, Sabah and Sarawak should have been consulted. They should have had the chance to agree or disagree, because this affected the original agreement they signed.

This situation is one reason why Sabah and Sarawak have raised concerns about their rights in Malaysia. They feel that they are not treated as equal partners. If one founding member can leave without their knowledge or agreement, what does that say about fairness and respect?

To fix this, Malaysia needs to look back at MA63 and treat Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners again. Their voices must be heard in all major national matters, especially those related to the foundation of the country.

In conclusion, Singapore’s exit was not just an expulsion. It was a mutual agreement between Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. But it was not fair to Sabah and Sarawak, who were left out. Understanding this helps us move towards a better, more respectful Malaysia for everyone.

“MA63 Timeline: Sabah & Sarawak’s Fight for Equal Partnership”

17 January 1962 – The Cobbold Commission was formed to survey whether the peoples of North Borneo (Sabah) and Sarawak supported forming a new federation called Malaysia.

1 August 1962 – The Cobbold Commission submitted its report, finding mixed support and recommending that North Borneo and Sarawak could enter into a new federation with proper safeguards for local interests.

9 July 1963 – The Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) was signed in London as an international treaty between five parties: the United Kingdom, the Federation of Malaya, North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak, and Singapore. This agreement set the terms for the creation of a new federation called Malaysia, combining these entities as founding partners-not as states “joining” an existing Malaya.

16 September 1963 – The Federation of Malaysia was officially established, founded by the United Kingdom, the Federation of Malaya, North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak, and Singapore under MA63 as equal parties.

9 August 1965 – Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia and became an independent republic, changing the original structure set out in MA63.

9 May 2018 – Pakatan Harapan won Malaysia’s general election and pledged to review and restore the rights of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners under MA63.

17 December 2018 – The first meeting of the MA63 Special Cabinet Committee was held to begin reviewing issues related to Sabah and Sarawak's autonomy.

23 July 2019 – A Special Cabinet Committee meeting resolved seven out of 21 MA63-related issues, leaving 14 for further discussion.

14 December 2021 – Malaysia’s Parliament unanimously passed a constitutional amendment recognising MA63 in Article 160(2) of the Federal Constitution, reaffirming the founding status of Sabah and Sarawak.

11 February 2022 – The constitutional amendment restoring the equal partner status of Sabah and Sarawak officially came into effect.

15 February 2022 – Sarawak formally changed its head of government title from “Chief Minister” to “Premier” as recognition of its equal partner status under MA63.

15 March 2022 – A group of Sarawakians filed a legal challenge in the Kuching High Court seeking to declare MA63 null and void.

April 2022 – The Sarawak government applied to strike out the lawsuit, arguing the court had no jurisdiction over the international treaty.

25 May 2023 – The Kuching High Court dismissed the suit and affirmed that the Federal Constitution remains the supreme law, with MA63 forming part of its foundation.

16 March 2025 – Deputy Prime Minister Fadillah Yusof announced that the MA63 Implementation Council will finalise matters on parliamentary seat quotas and the continental shelf in May.

References:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Agreement • https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Cobbold_Commission • https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/malaysia-agreement-1963-treatys-legal-standing-breaches-roger-chin-gdmrc • https://says.com/my/lifestyle/formation-of-malaysia-old-photos-malaysia-agreement-1963 • https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20750/volume-750-i-10760-english.pdf • https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=7fdd00ed-603e-47e0-8e08-f6499d385404 • https://www.rsnborneo.com/2024/11/the-malaysia-agreement-1963.html

The Truth About My Struggles and the Illusion Around Me

I went to a psychiatrist in a hospital because I could not sleep. I was having a hard time. I needed help. But the doctor did not treat me with care. He treated me as if I was only a problem. He wrote in his report that I missed classes and blamed financial problems. But that was real. I did not make it up. Financial problems are real for many young people like me.

People say young people today have it easy because we have smartphones, internet, and education. But they forget the truth. We have debt, high costs, and mental pressure. Student loans make our lives harder, not easier. Social media controls how we think and feel. It makes us compare, perform, and spend more. The marketing around us is manipulative. They push us to want things we don’t need.

I tried to open up and connect with others. I shared my pain and tried to make true friends. But some people used my mental health against me. They said I only wanted sympathy. They used my story to look good online. That is not friendship. That is fake and cruel. Social media in Malaysia is full of people pretending to care, but in real life, they do not support people like me.

In Malaysia, even the government wants to look good. They help people from other countries, like Palestinians, and make content to show how kind they are. But what about us? What about poor and disabled people in their own country? I got a little support, just daily allowance. They said my student loan means they will not help with my tuition. That is not fair. That is not real care.

If I speak out, people say I am ungrateful. They say I should move to another country. But loving your country means wanting it to be better. It means caring for all people, not just for show. True patriotism is helping each other during good and bad times. Not punishing someone with huge fines because they missed rent for one month.

I am tired of being silenced. I speak because my story matters. I know many others feel the same. We need to stop pretending and start caring — truly and equally.