<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Engagement &amp;mdash; Paul Sutton</title>
    <link>https://paper.wf/paulsutton/tag:Engagement</link>
    <description>Paul Sutton - personal blog </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Wise advice to employers</title>
      <link>https://paper.wf/paulsutton/wise-advice-to-employers</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Wise advice to employers&#xA;&#xA;This was posted to LinkedIn by Brigette Hyacinth&#xA;&#xA;Brigette makes a very interesting and important point with this.&#xA;&#xA;ME: Candidate accepted another offer.&#xA;CLIENT: I thought she really liked our company.&#xA;ME: Yes, she did&#xA;CLIENT: I don’t understand why she would throw away a great future here.&#xA;ME: She is very talented. She will have a great future wherever she chooses.&#xA;CLIENT: But we’re #1 in our space!&#xA;&#xA;Companies need to realize interviews are two-way streets. You are not only choosing the candidate, the candidate is choosing you as well. While you are taking 3+ months to hire someone (looking for perfection) putting candidates through multiple interviews and tests - another company recognized her worth and made her an offer far above the market range. If you want the best talent improve your hiring processes. Candidates have negotiating power too. &#xA;&#xA;Comment&#xA;&#xA;Personal experience seems to point to employers delaying getting back and delaying moving what should be a fairly simple process forward.  This leaves people not knowing what is going on, sometimes for weeks at a time. &#xA;&#xA;Employees who are keen to make a start will say so,  we appreciate that there are processes.   This is about the endless waiting and waiting for people to get back and keep us updated.   &#xA;Tags&#xA;&#xA;#Employment,#Employers,#Process,#Communication,#Engagement]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wise advice to employers</p>

<p>This was posted to LinkedIn by <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brigettehyacinth/" rel="nofollow">Brigette Hyacinth</a></p>

<p>Brigette makes a very interesting and important point with this.</p>

<pre><code>ME: Candidate accepted another offer.
CLIENT: I thought she really liked our company.
ME: Yes, she did
CLIENT: I don’t understand why she would throw away a great future here.
ME: She is very talented. She will have a great future wherever she chooses.
CLIENT: But we’re #1 in our space!

Companies need to realize interviews are two-way streets. You are not only choosing the candidate, the candidate is choosing you as well. While you are taking 3+ months to hire someone (looking for perfection) putting candidates through multiple interviews and tests - another company recognized her worth and made her an offer far above the market range. If you want the best talent improve your hiring processes. Candidates have negotiating power too. 
</code></pre>

<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>

<p>Personal experience seems to point to employers delaying getting back and delaying moving what should be a fairly simple process forward.  This leaves people not knowing what is going on, sometimes for weeks at a time.</p>

<p>Employees who are keen to make a start will say so,  we appreciate that there are processes.   This is about the endless waiting and waiting for people to get back and keep us updated.<br>
<strong>Tags</strong></p>

<p><a href="/paulsutton/tag:Employment" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Employment</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:Employers" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Employers</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:Process" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Process</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:Communication" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Communication</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:Engagement" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Engagement</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://paper.wf/paulsutton/wise-advice-to-employers</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>STEM Badge 50 hours engagement 2021/2022</title>
      <link>https://paper.wf/paulsutton/stem-badge-50-hours-engagement-2021-2022</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[STEM Badge 50 hours engagement 2021/2022&#xA;&#xA;Badge 50 hours&#xA;&#xA;Public badge link&#xA;&#xA;Tags&#xA;&#xA;#Badge,#Engagement,#hours,#STEMAmbasador]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STEM Badge 50 hours engagement 2021/2022</p>

<p><img src="https://images.credly.com/images/ec28f1eb-2bea-4e58-a8cf-834efecf5ec0/STEM_Badges_2021-22_50_Hours_Engagement_202122.png" alt="Badge 50 hours"></p>
<ul><li><a href="https://www.credly.com/badges/fa1ff756-c27a-4284-b5ec-975bfb553f3c/public_url" rel="nofollow">Public badge link</a></li></ul>

<p><strong>Tags</strong></p>

<p><a href="/paulsutton/tag:Badge" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Badge</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:Engagement" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Engagement</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:hours" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">hours</span></a>,<a href="/paulsutton/tag:STEMAmbasador" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">STEMAmbasador</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://paper.wf/paulsutton/stem-badge-50-hours-engagement-2021-2022</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>