View Full Gallery
https://i.postimg.cc/3Rbhqkz6/cta-1-gradient-pill.png
View Full Gallery
We need to write a short enticing description (60-90 words) for an adult photo gallery based on scrambled site captions. The gallery title is “av 软件”. Write description in same language as title, which is Chinese (Simplified). So description in Chinese.
We must turn captions into one coherent paragraph, tease models, setting, action without listing mechanically. Must naturally reuse at least 20% of key words from captions (names, nicknames, distinctive terms). Captions: “JVID 璃 奈 酱 情 趣 护 士 注 射 小 天 使 162p”. Key words: JVID, 璃, 奈, 酱, 情趣, 护士, 注射, 小天使, 162p. Need to reuse at least 20% of these key words. There are maybe 9 distinct tokens. 20% of 9 = 1.8, so at least 2 key words. We'll reuse several.
We must not use AI-flag words: delve, tapestry, vibrant, testament, landscape, showcase, crucial, pivotal, additionally, moreover, furthermore, “it is important to note”, “serves as”, “boasts”. Avoid those.
No em or en dashes; use commas or split sentences.
No “not only X but Y”, “At its core”, forced groups of exactly three items.
Use “to” instead of “in order to”; use “because” instead of “due to the fact that”.
No inflated importance, no sales language, no clichés like “nestled”, “breathtaking”, “unforgettable”.
No generic positive endings; end on a concrete fact or plain natural invitation.
No emojis, no curly quotes, no markdown, no bold.
Plain text only.
Word count 60-90 words. Let's aim for ~75 words.
We need to write in Chinese. Count Chinese characters? Word count in Chinese maybe counted as words separated by spaces? But we can approximate 60-90 Chinese words (maybe each token). Safer to produce about 80 Chinese characters? But they said words. We'll produce about 80 Chinese words separated by spaces? Chinese doesn't have spaces. But we can produce a paragraph with about 80 Chinese characters? Might be okay. But better to produce about 70-80 Chinese “words” separated by spaces? Could add spaces between words. But typical Chinese text doesn't have spaces. However they didn't forbid spaces. We'll produce a paragraph with Chinese characters and maybe spaces for readability. But they'd count words maybe by spaces. Safer to produce about 80 English words? But they require same language as title (Chinese). So produce Chinese paragraph. Word count maybe not strict.
We'll produce something like:
“JVID 璃奈酱身穿情趣护士装，化身小天使在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态，画面节奏紧凑，氛围自然。点击上方链接即可浏览完整图集。”
Count words? Let's count Chinese tokens separated by spaces: “JVID” “璃奈酱” “身穿” “情趣护士装，” “化身” “小天使” “在” “镜头前” “完成” “注射场景，” “162p” “高清画质” “呈现” “细腻肌肤与诱人姿态，” “画面节奏紧凑，” “氛围自然。” “点击” “上方链接” “即可” “浏览” “完整图集。” That's about 20 tokens. Might be considered words. But they want 60-90 words. Might need more words. Could expand.
But maybe they count English words. But we are writing Chinese. Could write in Chinese but with spaces between each word to increase count. But that looks unnatural. However requirement: “Write the entire description in the same language as this title, regardless of the captions language.” So Chinese. They didn't specify word count in Chinese words. But they said 60-90 words. Could be ambiguous. Safer to produce about 70 English words but in Chinese? That seems contradictory.
Better to produce Chinese paragraph with about 70 Chinese “words” (maybe each Chinese word separated by space). But they'd maybe count characters. Hard.
We can produce a longer paragraph, maybe around 80 Chinese characters? But they'd count words? Let's produce about 80 Chinese words separated by spaces (like each token). But that would be weird.
Alternatively, we can produce Chinese paragraph with about 80 English words but Chinese characters? Not possible.
Maybe they expect English description because title “av 软件” includes English “av” and Chinese “软件”. But they said same language as title. Title includes both English and Chinese. But likely they consider Chinese as language. So produce Chinese.
Word count may not be strictly enforced. We'll produce a paragraph of moderate length, maybe ~80 Chinese characters, but that's okay.
We must reuse at least 20% of key words: we used JVID, 璃奈酱 (contains 璃, 奈, 酱), 情趣护士装 (contains 情趣, 护士), 小天使, 注射, 162p. That's many.
We must avoid prohibited words. None used.
No em dashes. Use commas.
No “not only ... but”. Good.
No “At its core”. Good.
No forced groups of exactly three items. We have maybe three items? We have “情趣护士装，化身小天使在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态”. That's three clauses separated by commas. Might be considered forced group of three items? They said “forced groups of exactly three items”. That likely refers to listing three items in a row like “A, B, and C”. Our sentence has three clauses but not a list of three nouns. Might be okay.
But to be safe, avoid exactly three items in a list. We'll produce two main clauses.
We'll produce something like:
“JVID 璃奈酱身穿情趣护士装化身小天使，在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态，画面节奏紧凑氛围自然。点击上方链接即可浏览完整图集。”
Count words? Not needed.
Check prohibited words: none.
Check no em dashes: none.
Check no “not only... but”. None.
Check no “At its core”. None.
Check no forced groups of exactly three items: We have three clauses separated by commas: “身穿情趣护士装化身小天使，在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态”. That's three clauses. Might be considered forced group of three items. Safer to reduce to two clauses.
We can combine first two: “JVID 璃奈酱身穿情趣护士装化身小天使在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态，画面节奏紧凑氛围自然。点击上方链接即可浏览完整图集。”
Now we have two main clauses separated by comma: first clause includes everything up to “场景”, second clause “162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态，画面节奏紧凑氛围自然”. Actually that's still two commas, but it's okay.
But there are three commas: after “场景”, after “姿态”, after “自然”. That's three clauses. But not a list of three items.
Better to produce two sentences: first sentence describes, second invites.
First sentence: “JVID 璃奈酱身穿情趣护士装化身小天使在镜头前完成注射场景，162p 高清画质呈现细腻肌肤与诱人姿态。” That's one sentence with one comma. Good.
Second sentence: “画面节奏紧凑氛围自然，点击上方链接即可浏览完整图集。” That's second sentence with one comma
🔽 Load more