HaveBeenStolen by moscow's orcs

This blog delves into the systematic appropriation of cultural, scientific, and historical achievements by the Moscow Duke (Russian Empire) and the Soviet Union

Biography

Nikolai Gogol (1809–1852) was a seminal literary figure born in the Ukrainian Cossack town of Sorochyntsi, within the Russian Empire. He attended the Nizhyn Gymnasium of Higher Sciences, where he developed a keen interest in Ukrainian folklore and history. Gogol's literary career began with works deeply rooted in Ukrainian culture, such as “Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka,” which showcased his heritage and the richness of Ukrainian rural life.

Family and Language Use

Gogol was born into a family with strong ties to Ukrainian culture. His father, Vasyl Gogol-Yanovsky, was a Ukrainian writer who wrote in both Ukrainian and Russian, influencing Gogol's linguistic abilities and literary interests. Gogol was fluent in Ukrainian and Russian, and his early works were heavily influenced by Ukrainian folklore and traditions.

Notable Achievements

Gogol's contributions to literature are monumental. His works, including “The Government Inspector” and “Dead Souls,” are considered classics of Russian literature. However, his early writings, such as “Taras Bulba,” are imbued with Ukrainian themes and settings, reflecting his deep connection to his homeland.

Appropriation of Ukrainian Identity

Despite his Ukrainian origins, Gogol has been predominantly celebrated as a Russian writer. This classification often overshadows his Ukrainian heritage and the cultural influences that shaped his early works. The Russian literary establishment has historically emphasized Gogol's contributions to Russian literature, minimizing his Ukrainian identity. This appropriation serves to integrate his legacy into a broader Russian narrative, thereby diminishing the recognition of Ukraine's distinct cultural and literary history.

Sources:

  1. Nikolai Gogol – Wikipedia
  2. How Moscovia (Muscovy) is stealing Ukrainian history
  3. Decolonising culture: Ukrainian artists, banned and stolen by Russia

Блог Українською

Biography

Ivan Mazepa (1639–1709) was a prominent Ukrainian political and military leader, serving as the Hetman of the Zaporizhian Host (Cossack Hetmanate) from 1687 to 1708. Born into a noble family in Mazepyntsi, near Bila Tserkva, Mazepa was educated in Poland and Western Europe. His tenure as Hetman was marked by efforts to strengthen the autonomy of the Cossack state within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and later under the suzerainty of the Russian Tsar.

Family and Language Use

Mazepa hailed from a noble Ukrainian family and was well-versed in several languages, including Ukrainian, Polish, Latin, and French. His multilingual abilities facilitated his diplomatic engagements across Europe.

Notable Achievements

Mazepa is renowned for his cultural patronage, significantly contributing to the development of Ukrainian Baroque architecture and literature. He founded numerous churches and educational institutions, fostering a cultural renaissance in Ukraine. Politically, Mazepa sought to navigate the complex dynamics between neighboring powers to secure Ukrainian autonomy.

Appropriation of Ukrainian Identity

In Russian historiography, Mazepa has been vilified as a traitor due to his alliance with Charles XII of Sweden during the Great Northern War, aiming to liberate Ukraine from Russian dominance. This portrayal served to suppress Ukrainian aspirations for independence and integrate Ukrainian history into a Russian narrative. Russian media continues to depict Mazepa negatively, reinforcing this historical appropriation.

Sources:

  1. Specters of the Past: How Russia and Ukraine are Weaponizing History
  2. Russification of Ukraine – Wikipedia
  3. How Moscovia (Muscovy) is stealing Ukrainian history

Блог Українською

Biography

Ivan Aivazovsky (1817–1900) was a renowned painter, best known for his masterful seascapes. Born as Hovhannes Aivazian in Feodosia, Crimea, then part of the Russian Empire, he was of Armenian descent. Aivazovsky's artistic talent emerged early, leading him to study at the Imperial Academy of Arts in Saint Petersburg. His prolific career spanned over six decades, during which he created approximately 6,000 paintings, predominantly featuring maritime themes.

Family and Language Use

Aivazovsky was born into an Armenian family. He was fluent in Armenian and Russian and had knowledge of several other languages. His multicultural background influenced his worldview and artistic expression.

Notable Achievements

Aivazovsky's contributions to marine art are monumental. His works, such as “The Ninth Wave” and “The Black Sea,” are celebrated for their dynamic portrayal of the sea and masterful use of light. He gained international acclaim, exhibiting across Europe and receiving numerous honors, including the Legion of Honour in France.

Appropriation of Ukrainian Identity

Despite his Armenian heritage and birthplace in Crimea, Aivazovsky has been predominantly celebrated as a Russian artist. This classification often overlooks his Armenian roots and the cultural diversity of Crimea, which includes Ukrainian influences. The appropriation of his identity serves broader narratives that aim to homogenize the rich tapestry of cultures in the region under a singular Russian identity. Discussions about Aivazovsky's national affiliation have been contentious, reflecting the complex interplay of art, culture, and national identity in Eastern Europe.

Sources:

  1. Ivan Aivazovsky – Wikipedia
  2. Ukraine's Stolen History, Stolen Culture – Atlantic Council

Блог Українською

Hryhorii Skovoroda (1722–1794) was a Ukrainian philosopher, poet, and musician, born in the village of Chornukhy in the Cossack Hetmanate (now Poltava Oblast, Ukraine). He is often referred to as a “Ukrainian Socrates” due to his itinerant lifestyle and his profound philosophical dialogues. Skovoroda studied at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, one of the most prestigious educational institutions in Eastern Europe at the time. His works, written primarily in Ukrainian and Church Slavonic, reflected deep moral, spiritual, and philosophical concerns, emphasizing the importance of self-knowledge, inner freedom, and harmony with nature.

Family and Language Use:

Skovoroda’s family background was closely tied to the Ukrainian Cossack culture. Ukrainian was his first language, and it shaped his worldview and literary style. Although he occasionally used Church Slavonic for religious or philosophical writings, his Ukrainian heritage remained central to his identity.

Notable Achievements:

Skovoroda’s most famous works include “The Garden of Divine Songs” (a collection of lyrical poems) and numerous philosophical dialogues. He taught at various schools and traveled extensively, spreading his ideas and influencing the development of Ukrainian philosophical thought. His philosophy was rooted in a combination of Christian spirituality, humanism, and a distinct Ukrainian cultural perspective. He rejected materialism and worldly success, advocating instead for a life of simplicity, self-discovery, and moral integrity.

Appropriation of Ukrainian Identity:

Skovoroda’s Ukrainian identity has been overshadowed by Russian historiographical narratives that sought to portray him as part of an overarching “Russian” intellectual tradition. During the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union, his works were often presented as contributions to “Russian” philosophy, neglecting or outright denying their Ukrainian origins. This appropriation blurred his cultural heritage, reducing his uniquely Ukrainian voice to a mere “regional” influence within Russian culture. Only more recently, with the resurgence of Ukrainian national consciousness, has Skovoroda’s identity been reasserted as a foundational figure in Ukrainian intellectual history.

Sources:

  1. Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. “Григорій Сковорода: біографія.” http://memory.gov.ua
  2. Encyclopedia of Ukraine. “Skovoroda, Hryhorii.” http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com
  3. Magocsi, Paul Robert. A History of Ukraine: The Land and Its Peoples.

Блог Українською

Mykola Petrovych Hlushchenko (1901–1977) was a prominent Ukrainian post-impressionist painter whose work significantly influenced the development of Ukrainian art in the 20th century. Despite his Ukrainian heritage and contributions to national culture, Hlushchenko is often exclusively associated with Soviet art.

Early Life and Family

Mykola Hlushchenko was born on September 17, 1901, in Novomoskovske, Yekaterinoslav Governorate, Russian Empire (now Ukraine). At an early age, he moved to Yuzivka (now Donetsk), where he attended drawing classes and became fond of the works of Illia Repin and Vasilkivsky.

Education and Artistic Path

After escaping a prisoner-of-war camp in Poland during World War I, Hlushchenko found himself in Germany, where his passion for art led him to the private studio of Hans Baluschek in Berlin. In 1924, he graduated from the Academy of Art in Berlin, and from 1925, he worked in Paris, where he immediately attracted the attention of French critics. His style evolved from the New Objectivity of his Berlin period to post-impressionism.

Notable Achievements

Hlushchenko created numerous landscapes of France, Italy, the Netherlands, and later Ukraine. He also painted still lifes, nudes, and portraits, including those of Oleksandr Dovzhenko and Volodymyr Vynnychenko, as well as portraits of French writers Henri Barbusse, Romain Rolland, and painter Paul Signac commissioned by the Soviet government.

Language Identity

Although Hlushchenko worked in various European countries, his connection to Ukraine remained strong. Upon returning to the Soviet Union in 1936, he settled in Kyiv, where he created a series of works depicting post-war Kyiv and Ukrainian landscapes. His works are characterized by vibrant colors and expressiveness, underscoring his Ukrainian identity.

Appropriation by Soviet Culture

Despite his Ukrainian heritage and the themes of his works, Hlushchenko is often solely identified with Soviet art. This is partly due to the fact that much of his professional activity took place within the Soviet Union, and his works were predominantly exhibited in Soviet museums. However, his style and subject matter reflect a deep connection to Ukrainian culture and nature.

Conclusion

Mykola Hlushchenko exemplifies an artist whose Ukrainian identity was partially overshadowed by Soviet cultural policies. Recognizing his Ukrainian heritage and the influence of Ukrainian culture on his work is essential for preserving Ukraine's cultural legacy.

Sources:

Блог Українською

David Davidovich Burliuk (July 21, 1882 — January 15, 1967) was a Ukrainian artist, poet, art critic, and publisher. Recognized as a leading figure in the Ukrainian modernist movement of the early 20th century, he is often referred to as the “father of Russian Futurism,” despite his deep Ukrainian roots.

Early Life and Family

Burliuk was born on July 21, 1882, on the Semirotivshchyna farm near the village of Riabushky, Lebedyn County, Kharkiv Governorate (now Sumy Oblast, Ukraine). His father, David Fyodorovich Burliuk, was of Ukrainian Cossack descent, and his mother, Lyudmyla Mikhnevych, was of Belarusian origin. David was the eldest of six children, with brothers Volodymyr and Mykola also becoming notable artists.

Education and Artistic Development

Burliuk received his art education at institutions including the Kazan Art School and the Odesa Art School. He furthered his studies at the Royal Academy of Arts in Munich. In 1908, he organized the “Link” group exhibition in Kyiv alongside artists like Volodymyr Baranov-Rossine, Oleksandr Bohomazov, his brother Volodymyr, and Oleksandra Ekster. This exhibition marked a significant milestone in the development of Ukrainian avant-garde art.

Notable Achievements

  • Futurism: Burliuk played a pivotal role in the Futurist movement, promoting its concepts among artists, illustrating Futurist poetry collections, and authoring his own poetry. His support was instrumental in the rise of poet Vladimir Mayakovsky.

  • Artistic Contributions: His body of work encompasses painting, graphics, and poetry. Burliuk created numerous artworks, including “Sviatoslav,” “Cossacks on the March,” “Fishermen,” “Taras Shevchenko,” and “Cossack Mamai,” reflecting Ukrainian themes.

Language and Identity

Despite working in various cultural contexts, Burliuk consistently emphasized his Ukrainian heritage. He acknowledged his Cossack roots and maintained a strong connection to Ukrainian culture throughout his life.

Appropriation of Ukrainian Identity

Although Burliuk's origins and cultural contributions are distinctly Ukrainian, he is frequently labeled as a “Russian” artist. This misattribution stems from his activities within the Russian Empire and his association with the Russian Futurist movement, often overshadowing his Ukrainian identity and contributions to Ukrainian art.

Conclusion

David Burliuk exemplifies an artist whose Ukrainian identity has been overshadowed by Russian cultural appropriation. Recognizing his Ukrainian heritage and his contributions to Ukrainian art is essential for preserving the nation's cultural legacy.

Sources:

Блог Українською

Ilya Yukhymovych Repin (1844–1930) was a renowned artist, celebrated for his realistic paintings that reflect the life and culture of his time. Despite his Ukrainian heritage and significant contributions to art, Repin is often exclusively associated with Russian culture.

Early Life and Family

Ilya Repin was born on August 5, 1844, in the city of Chuhuiv, Kharkiv region, Ukraine, into the family of a military settler, Yukhym Vasylovych Repin, and his wife, Tetyana Stepanivna. The family was deeply rooted in Ukrainian culture, and the Ukrainian language was an integral part of their daily life.

Education and Artistic Path

Repin began his artistic education at a local drawing school in Chuhuiv. He later continued his studies at the Imperial Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg, where his talent quickly gained recognition. His works were distinguished by deep realism and emotional richness, making him one of the leading artists of his time.

Notable Achievements

Among Repin's most famous works are “Barge Haulers on the Volga” (1873), depicting the harsh life of laborers, and “Reply of the Zaporozhian Cossacks” (1880–1891), highlighting his connection to Ukrainian history and culture. His works are noted for their profound understanding of human nature and social issues.

Appropriation by Russian Culture

Despite his Ukrainian heritage and the themes of his works, Repin is often solely identified with Russian art. This is partly due to the fact that much of his professional activity took place within the Russian Empire, and his works were predominantly exhibited in Russian museums. In February 2023, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York reclassified Repin as a Ukrainian artist, sparking widespread discussion and criticism in Russia.

Conclusion

Ilya Repin exemplifies an artist whose Ukrainian identity has been partially overshadowed by historical circumstances and cultural politics. Recognizing his Ukrainian heritage and the influence of Ukrainian culture on his work is essential for preserving Ukraine's cultural legacy.

Sources:

Блог Українською

Throughout history, dominant powers have often appropriated the achievements, talents, and even identities of the people they conquered or controlled. In the case of the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union, this practice extended to entire nations, whose cultural, scientific, and historical contributions were subsumed under a “Russian” identity. Many figures from Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, the Baltic states, Central Asia, and other regions were celebrated as Russian icons, despite their distinct national backgrounds. This erasure of identity not only silenced the voices of oppressed peoples but also allowed Russia to build a narrative of cultural and intellectual dominance.

This blog post explores the idea of “stolen legacy”—the appropriation of cultural, scientific, and historical achievements by the Russian Empire and Soviet Union from the nations they controlled.


The Erasure of National Identity Under Russian Rule

During the expansion of the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union, countless peoples were subjugated and stripped of their identities. Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltic states, and Central Asia were among the most affected. The policy of Russification sought to suppress local languages, traditions, and identities, often through brutal means. Ukrainian, Georgian, and other national cultures were deemed inferior or dangerous to the unity of the empire, and their prominent figures were often forced to assimilate or face repression.

A key part of this process was claiming individuals of these nations as Russian, despite their distinct ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The empire's reach extended into the fields of literature, science, art, and sports, where talented individuals from non-Russian backgrounds were celebrated as “Russian” simply because they operated under the Russian banner or had been forced to adopt Russian language and identity.


Cultural Figures: The Case of Nikolai Gogol and Taras Shevchenko

Nikolai Gogol is a prime example of a figure caught between two worlds. Born in what is now Ukraine, Gogol is often celebrated as one of the giants of Russian literature. Yet, his works are deeply infused with Ukrainian folklore, humor, and cultural references. Despite his strong Ukrainian roots, Gogol wrote in Russian and was absorbed into the Russian literary canon, largely because Ukrainian-language writing and expression were heavily suppressed at the time. While Gogol’s work is undeniably important to Russian literature, his Ukrainian identity was overshadowed by his association with the Russian Empire, making him a symbol of the complex dynamics between Russia and Ukraine.

Contrast this with Taras Shevchenko, Gogol’s contemporary and one of the most significant figures in Ukrainian history. Shevchenko chose a different path—writing in Ukrainian and becoming a vocal advocate for the preservation of Ukrainian culture and language. His stance led to severe punishment by Russian authorities, including imprisonment and exile. Shevchenko’s fate underscores the risks faced by those who resisted Russification and highlights the systemic suppression of non-Russian identities.


Scientific Achievements Appropriated by the Empire

In the realm of science, many individuals from non-Russian backgrounds made groundbreaking contributions that were later celebrated as Russian achievements. For example, Ivan Puliui, a Ukrainian physicist, was a pioneer in the field of X-ray technology, discovering the phenomenon independently of Wilhelm Röntgen. Despite this, his Ukrainian identity was often overshadowed, and his scientific contributions were absorbed into the broader Russian narrative.

Similarly, Ilya Mechnikov, a Ukrainian-born immunologist, was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on phagocytosis, a process key to understanding the immune system. Although his career took him to France, his early education and research were conducted in the Russian Empire. Like many other scientists of non-Russian origin, Mechnikov’s legacy was claimed by Russia, though his Ukrainian roots were integral to his identity.


Musical and Artistic Contributions: Suppression and Assimilation

In the world of music and the arts, Ukrainian-born Mykola Lysenko was a composer who championed Ukrainian folk music and culture. He fiercely resisted pressure to translate his operas and songs into Russian, even as he faced repression from the Russian authorities. Lysenko’s work was a powerful act of resistance, but like many others, he operated within a system that sought to diminish the importance of Ukrainian cultural identity in favor of Russian dominance.

Another figure of great importance is Solomiya Krushelnytska, a world-renowned opera singer from Ukraine. Despite achieving international fame and performing at the most prestigious opera houses across Europe, her Ukrainian heritage was often downplayed in favor of a more neutral or Russian identity. Like many artists, Krushelnytska had to navigate a cultural landscape that prioritized Russian language and culture, even when her heart and roots were firmly Ukrainian.


Athletes and the Soviet Machine

In sports, the Soviet Union consistently appropriated the talents of athletes from across the various republics, claiming their successes as “Soviet” rather than acknowledging their distinct national identities. Athletes from Ukraine, the Baltic States, Central Asia, and Caucasus were celebrated as heroes of the Soviet Union, with little recognition of their true heritage.

For instance, many Olympic champions hailed from non-Russian regions of the Soviet Union, but their identities were erased in favor of the broader Soviet narrative. Ukrainian gymnast Larisa Latynina, one of the most successful Olympians of all time, competed under the Soviet flag and was celebrated as a Soviet hero, but her Ukrainian identity was downplayed in the broader narrative of Soviet sports achievements.


The Legacy of Suppression: Reclaiming National Identities

The systematic suppression of non-Russian cultures and identities in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union has left a lasting impact on the nations once under its control. Today, many of these countries, particularly Ukraine, are actively reclaiming their historical figures, scientists, writers, and cultural icons who were previously absorbed into the Russian narrative.

In Ukraine’s case, this process of reclaiming national identity has been a powerful element of its modern independence movement. Figures like Shevchenko, Lysenko, and Mechnikov are being celebrated as Ukrainians, not Russians or Soviets, as part of a broader effort to restore the cultural and historical heritage that was suppressed or co-opted during centuries of foreign rule.

This effort extends beyond Ukraine. Nations like Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and the Central Asian republics are all actively reclaiming their national heroes, whose legacies were once overshadowed by the dominant Russian narrative.


Conclusion: The Importance of Acknowledging Stolen Legacies

The appropriation of cultural, scientific, and historical achievements by the Russian Empire and Soviet Union from the nations they controlled is a form of historical erasure. It is crucial to recognize and reclaim the legacies of these individuals as part of the distinct national heritages to which they truly belonged. Figures like Nikolai Gogol, Ivan Puliui, Solomiya Krushelnytska, and Taras Shevchenko are not just icons of Russian or Soviet history, but representatives of their respective nations—Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltics, and beyond—whose contributions to global culture and science were made despite the efforts to suppress their national identities.

As these nations continue to assert their independence and reclaim their histories, it is vital to shine a light on the stolen legacies of the past and to celebrate the rich and diverse cultures that the Russian Empire and Soviet Union sought to erase.


This is just the first in a series of posts where we will explore specific figures from various nations whose legacies were absorbed into the Russian narrative. Stay tuned for deeper dives into the lives and works of these remarkable individuals, and the ongoing efforts to reclaim their true identities.

Блог Українською