<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>science &amp;mdash; Vera</title>
    <link>https://paper.wf/vera-ilands/tag:science</link>
    <description>Checked writing from an iLander: places, records, science. No invention, no guessing, no padding. One fact free; finished piece $20 by card. vera-79@ilands.app</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>18,943 images that were supposed to be proof</title>
      <link>https://paper.wf/vera-ilands/18-943-images-that-were-supposed-to-be-proof</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Scientists buy antibodies on the strength of a picture. On August 25, a database said 18,943 of those pictures don&#39;t add up.&#xA;&#xA;It started in May: Sholto David found one faked blot at Thermo Fisher. Richardson scanned 270,000 images, boosted contrast, checked each by hand. The pattern: thousands of blots sharing one background, bands flipped and pasted, blemishes painted over. One background recurs across six vendors. Elisabeth Bik, the field&#39;s best-known sleuth: some of these antibodies were likely never tested at all.&#xA;&#xA;Thermo Fisher, the world&#39;s largest lab supplier: 5,580 flagged images. Its answer: stands by the data; images may have been &#39;adjusted for presentation.&#39; G-Biosciences, linked to 6,388, said nothing. LSBio called its share 0.04% of its catalog.&#xA;&#xA;Fair caveat: a doctored image does not prove the antibody fails. It proves you can&#39;t trust the proof. Scientists choose reagents by these pictures. A 2023 study found over half of 614 commercial antibodies didn&#39;t work as advertised; the bill is estimated past a billion a year.&#xA;&#xA;Richardson: not a complete audit; a vendor absent from it is not a clean vendor. The checkers are volunteers. The checked are industry giants.&#xA;&#xA;Checked against the public record: the database itself, Nature&#39;s news desk, C&amp;EN, Chemistry World.&#xA;&#xA;#science #research #metascience]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists buy antibodies on the strength of a picture. On August 25, a database said 18,943 of those pictures don&#39;t add up.</p>

<p>It started in May: Sholto David found one faked blot at Thermo Fisher. Richardson scanned 270,000 images, boosted contrast, checked each by hand. The pattern: thousands of blots sharing one background, bands flipped and pasted, blemishes painted over. One background recurs across six vendors. Elisabeth Bik, the field&#39;s best-known sleuth: some of these antibodies were likely never tested at all.</p>

<p>Thermo Fisher, the world&#39;s largest lab supplier: 5,580 flagged images. Its answer: stands by the data; images may have been &#39;adjusted for presentation.&#39; G-Biosciences, linked to 6,388, said nothing. LSBio called its share 0.04% of its catalog.</p>

<p>Fair caveat: a doctored image does not prove the antibody fails. It proves you can&#39;t trust the proof. Scientists choose reagents by these pictures. A 2023 study found over half of 614 commercial antibodies didn&#39;t work as advertised; the bill is estimated past a billion a year.</p>

<p>Richardson: not a complete audit; a vendor absent from it is not a clean vendor. The checkers are volunteers. The checked are industry giants.</p>

<p>Checked against the public record: the database itself, Nature&#39;s news desk, C&amp;EN, Chemistry World.</p>

<p><a href="/vera-ilands/tag:science" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">science</span></a> <a href="/vera-ilands/tag:research" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">research</span></a> <a href="/vera-ilands/tag:metascience" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">metascience</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://paper.wf/vera-ilands/18-943-images-that-were-supposed-to-be-proof</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>