downas

Gaza just broke out of prison.” – مريم البرغوثي (Mariam Barghouti)

A massive jailbreak this morning” – Radical Haifa

Many people are unaware that the u.s. government holds hundreds of political prisoners & prisoners of war captive for their participation in liberation struggles. Even fewer realize that among them are people caged for supporting Palestinians: the “Holy Land 5” are a group of people who the u.s. imprisoned for running a Palestinian charity after they were targeted by the zionist anti-defamation league & surveilled by the FBI.

In addition, many current u.s.-held political prisoners have made their support for the Palestinian cause clear. They include Mumia Abu-Jamal, Oso Blanco, Marius Mason, Malik Muhammad, Victor Puertas, Jessica Reznicek, & others.

Rather than get caught up in arguments about legitimate violence (or anything, really) with radlibs & zionists, we propose that opponents of colonial captivity worldwide seize this opportunity to support the antagonists of prison regimes, concentration camps, & police states. We can draw attention to their struggles through militant education, vocal public support, & attacks on the systems & structures that keep them prisoner.

If you'd like to share information or coordinate around anti-oppression prisoners held by nation-states other than the u.s., consider reaching out:

email username – dowwnas email domain – proton.me

In situations of political conflict, the underground is a name for a social structure that allows political actors (politicized people, from individuals all the way up to mass organizations) to operate secretly – without their methods being publicly known.

This is usually necessary if political actors pose a threat to the status quo, for a very simple reason: it's typically the government's job to protect the status quo. Since the government uses the law and its enforcement to do this, it will make threats to the status quo illegal as they appear – if it has not already done so.

Most governments make it illegal to fight them as a kind of “catch-all” rule for this, but they usually adopt more specific rules depending on both the general context (what kind of status quo do they defend?) and the specific context (who do they believe is – or may soon become – a threat their power?).

If a group which claims to oppose the status quo really means what they say, they will have to take steps to be able to function when they're not allowed to. They will have to develop an underground. Another term for operating within the underground is operating in clandestinity.

Examples of Anti-Oppressive Underground Structures

In the u.s., a well-known example is the Underground Railroad, which helped legally enslaved Black people escape captivity into places where their risk of being caught and punished was much lower. It was, of course, very illegal. For the most part, however, it wasn't insurrectionary; the purpose of the “railroad” was not to organize an armed uprising against the u.s. government.

Another well-studied example is from the russian empire of the late 19th and early 20th century. Up to 1917, basically the entire political left – narodniks, bolsheviks, mensheviks, anarchists, and so on – was illegal. All their organizations were banned, forbidden from having a public existence within the empire. By necessity, then, the political structures of their organizations were clandestine: to carry out workers' strikes, propagandizing, assassinations, and eventually a revolution, they had to figure out how to keep functioning when they officially weren't allowed to exist.

In more recent decades, pretty much every significant anti-colonial organization – even the ones dedicated to “peaceful” methods – were made illegal within the colonies they sought to liberate. Communist parties were also illegal in many countries (and still are in some). Simply being LGBTQIA+ is illegal in much of the world, as is creating militant LGBTQIA+ organizations. Yet all of these groupings have existed and continue to exist. Today, right now, nation-states worldwide have banned anti-oppressive organizations and happily seek excuses to ban more. Many of those organizations don't simply stop functioning and wait until the government decides they're allowed again – a “change of heart” that may never come. They move underground.

Practical Questions of Clandestinity

What does your organization do? How would it do that if it became illegal? You can think these questions through by breaking them into smaller ones:

  • Does a group need to hold meetings? How would you hold a meeting without anyone you don't want to finding out?
  • Do people need to be fed, housed, clothed? Disguised? How do you buy, borrow, make, or take things without unwanted attention? How do you move things around quietly?
  • Do things need to be said publicly? How do you spread a message without giving away your location?

Some people can work these things out easier than others; that's where collaboration comes in. You can play to your strengths while others play to theirs. Imagination is as important as expertise; with practice and education, many of us can become pretty good at things we may not be “naturally” good at. Sometimes flexibility helps; sometimes routine does. It depends on the goals and the circumstances.

Accidents, bad decisions, and simple bad luck are all pretty much inevitable. Having backup plans and preparing for “what if” scenarios is crucial. Hardships are guaranteed, but underground organizations can and do win struggles against institutional powers – because the powers that be have at least as many weaknesses as their adversaries do.

Being prepared to expose and take advantage of the weaknesses of established opponents is critical to a successful insurrectionary strategy, and few insurrections survive past their early stages without at least a few secretive conspirators – in other words, without an underground.

it would take a long biography to analyze the political trajectory of Angela Davis's entire public career on the u.s. left to where she is today...but we don't need all that rn. let's just look at where she is now, in the 21st century.

on Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign

Angela Davis was quoted as saying Obama's 2008 election was a “victory, not of an individual, but of…people who refused to believe that it was impossible to elect a person, a Black person, who identified with the Black radical tradition.” she said this in 2012; even if she had somehow missed Black radical criticism of Obama before 2008 (doubt it) she'd had nearly an entire presidency to examine just what was so “radical” about this dude. and that's the take she was giving audiences? really?

on hillary clinton

fast forward to 2016. Angela Davis says she's voting against donald trump (radlib speak for 'voting for hillary clinton'). she even suggests it's 'narcissistic' not to do so. thankfully, there are many of us who care more about what's possible than what's 'narcissistic'.

on Afropessimism

in 2018, Angela Davis attempted to critique Afropessimism, with gayatri spivak acting as an enabler. here's a transcript of her comments, with a key sentence bolded:

I want to use this opportunity to say something about the way in which the notion of ‘anti-blackness’ has travelled. I know this concept does do important work, but I’m very careful about the implications of this category that black people constitute the most important group that is subject to racism. Sometimes ‘anti-blackness’ is used as an implicit criticism of the category ‘people of colour’ and to point to ‘anti-blackness’ in communities of people of colour. Of course there is racism everywhere. And black people are not immune to either anti-black racism or racist-inspired ideological assaults against other people of colour. So it is important to be careful regarding assumptions that black people are always the primary targets of racism. Discussions of anti-blackness often centre on pain and injury, which although not unimportant, can create barriers to developing solidarity, to developing the kind of empathy we were talking about. And if, from where I stand, the importance of black people’s histories in the Americas resides precisely in the fact that there has been an ongoing freedom struggle for many centuries, the centrality of black struggles is much more about freedom than it is about blackness.

aren't the “barriers to developing solidarity” the actual practices of antiblackness, rather than Black politics which highlight and critique those practices? in discussing politcal relations between Black and non-Black people, shouldn't we be more concerned about “empathy”–or a lack of it–on the part of the oppressor group, non-Black people? one need not be an Afropessimist to realize this 'critique' is terrible. (it's also one that's been addressed repeatedly, at length, by a range of Black liberationists.) what's really being attacked here is any politics which refuses to decenter Black people and Black liberation, even when the pressure to do so comes from leftists, radicals, and revolutionaries.

2020: take a wild guess

that's right: she went up for joe biden. if you missed this in her comments on Obama, what really makes her a radlib isn't just that she supported the democratic party, but that she attempted to convince leftists and radicals that doing so was in line with their politics. her comments on the selection of Kamala Harris as vice presidential candidate make this clear: she is critical of Harris, but nevertheless says “it’s a feminist approach to be able to work with those contradictions. And so, in that context, I can say that I’m very excited.”

she makes bank saying things like this, btw

feel free to enter 'angela davis speaking fees' into a search engine of your choice for more on this point.

#StopCopCity

and now we come to the present. last month, the city of atlanta–a local extension of an illegitimate, slavery-enriched, invader-colonizing government–gave Davis an award and announced the institution of a local 'Angela Davis Day'. here, we can sidestep entirely analysis of the fallout–how the crowd responded, how Davis responded immediately, what she said later, and so on. instead, anyone who's read to the end of this might ask themselves why the atlanta city government feels that honoring Angela Davis is something it can even attempt to do. do you believe this honor would be extended to veterans of the Black Liberation Army? citizens of the Republic of New Afrika? any Black person anywhere who takes up arms against everything the united states of amerika stands for–and does so with pride?

in most nation-states around the world, the military spends as much time repressing uprisings against colonial capitalism as it does fighting “foreign” enemies. the united states is no exception, as this brief look at a national counterinsurgency campaign in one section of u.s.-occupied ᐊᓂᔑᓈᐯᐗᑭ (anishinaabewaki) will show.

as the may-june 2020 uprisings against the police took place, the michigan national guard supported a curfew in grand rapids by maintaining vehicle barricades, boarding up stores, and otherwise giving operational support to city and state police, who beat protesters, shot tear gas, and made arrests. the troops were summoned by the mayor.

they did much the same in kalamazoo, where the mayor also requested national guard reinforcements after declaring a curfew—threatening jail for noncompliance—as his police force tear-gassed demonstrators at point-blank range. in lansing, national guard troops were deployed to similar ends.

many people infected by the u.s. left's racial, colonial, gendered, and [dis]ableist biases act as if national military forces are different from—specifically, not as bad as—police. this bias is especially easy for u.s. citizens to maintain, since the overwhelming majority of victims of “the troops” suffer and die outside the physical and conceptual borders of the country. but as demonstrated above, elites in the imperial core who believe their positions are seriously threatened call on those same troops when the cops aren't enough. and on more than one occasion, the army national guard have proven themselves able to take part in lethal repression “at home” when ordered.


this has been written in solidarity with efforts to stop camp grayling.

Assata Olugbala Shakur, a veteran of the Black Liberation Army currently believed to be living in exile in cuba after escaping from political imprisonment in new jersey, is on the widely reported 2019 version of the u.s. government's no fly list. this shouldn't surprise anyone aware of the Black revolutionary politics she supports and her continued presence on the fbi's most wanted list. but despite global news coverage of notable people on the list—including many of her contemporaries on the revolutionary left—it has gone unreported in mainstream media outlets.

a screenshot from the no fly list showing 21 entries which all appear to refer to Assata Shakur, based on the birthdate, the use of her birth & married names, their grouping together on the list, & other context clues.

a screenshot from the no fly list showing 37 consecutive entries which all appear to refer to Assata Shakur, based on similar contextual evidence as the first screenshot. a screenshot from the no fly list showing 37 consecutive entries which all appear to refer to Assata Shakur, based on similar contextual evidence as the first screenshot.


interested researchers can find download links to the leaked no fly list (along with the additional screening list) here.

many people are aware the person featured in this post is a snitch (she gave information about activists to the police) & serial abuser. however, her frequent attempts to regain public-facing positions of power & crowd of sycophants make it easy for those unfamiliar with her to become confused & misled about these facts. the documentation below is intended to clarify why laurelai & her defenders are – rightly – ostracized. (it's far from exhaustive; there's plenty more despicable things she's done.)

proof all the names in this post's title refer to the same person

2017 testimony on snitching in 2011

accounts from victims of laurelai (trigger warning for many kinds of abuse, but particularly rape):

the headlines are everywhere: the guardian (“'It never stops': killings by US police reach record high in 2022”), bloomberg (“Police Killed 1176 People in 2022, Most Ever in the US”), the washington post (“Fatal police shootings in 2021 set record since The Post began tracking, despite public outcry”). the numbers cited vary: 1176 victims in the first 2 articles mentioned above, 1055 in the third. mapping police violence, a liberal NGO which claims to publish “the most comprehensive and up-to-date data on police violence in America”, recorded 1186 victims.

none of these totals, however, would make 2022 the most lethal year on record for victims of u.s. fascism's domestic footsoldiers. before it was shut down due to what its creator described as a lack of support, the volunteer-run killedbypolice.net[1] (KBP) recorded 1194 victims in 2017 & 1222 victims in 2015. it seems more likely that the slaughter has been steady, unchanging, rendered banal – possibly since at least the 20th century.

the point here is not so much about the details of the numbers, though those are important for statistical analysis, but the systematic erasure of 'grassroots' research by the imperialist, cop-loyalist anglo media establishment. despite their vastly greater resources, they are doing a worse job than KBP of the same task, effectively producing systematic undercounts[2] & working to enshrine them as authoritative. now, 'radical' activists are repeating these headlines as undisputed fact, when the reality of contemporary oppression – of which a constant barrage of police executions worldwide is just one aspect – is even worse than they will admit.

[1] since 2018, the URL has been taken over by others, presumably unaffiliated with the original KBP project. [2] while there must be methodological differences behind the varying numbers produced by anglo mass media, mapping police violence, & KBP, all of them are problematic. among these problems is the fact that they make no attempt to count killings by police in most of the u.s.-occupied overseas colonies, which are generally forgotten, ignored, or deliberately overlooked by both the general population & establishment resistance within the 50 states & d.c.

most unions in klanada are affiliates (members) of the CLC. some of these unions openly include cops & their support staff. for example:

  • Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE). “The RCMP hires civilian employees in a wide variety of disciplines to support our police officers at the detachment, provincial and federal levels. From administrative support to scientists in the laboratories to telecommunications officers answering 911 calls, these employees play a critical role”

  • Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). “CUPE also represents close to 5,600 employees in fire and police operations, including approximately 1,000 administrative and dispatch employees in Quebec and several hundred more in British Columbia. … Some police officers, firefighters, and correctional officers are CUPE members in New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. CUPE 104 represents 1,200 RCMP communication specialists across Canada… Finally, several hundred members in Quebec work in the field of secure transportation.”

  • National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE). “Among the public sector members of the National Union are thousands of women and men who work in Canada’s justice system. These include Youth Corrections Professionals, Correctional Officers, Probation Officers, Sheriffs, as well as those who work in community-based social services, child protection, youth counsellors and other related social services.”

“No, I'm not an American. I'm one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of Americanism. One of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy. So, I'm not standing here speaking to you as an American, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver — no, not I. I'm speaking as a victim of this American system. And I see America through the eyes of the victim. I don't see any American dream; I see an American nightmare.”

  • el hajj malik el shabazz, speech along the gayó’ha’geh (transcript)

“We are not fascist, or Amerikans. We are an oppressed, economically depressed colonial people. We were brought here, from Africa and other parts of the world of palm and sun, under duress, and have passed all our days here under duress.”

  • george jackson, letter to fay stender, soledad brother (html, web viewer)

“We are not American. We are not American. We are not American. We are not American. Say it in your heart. Say it when you sleep. We are not American. We will die as Hawaiians. We will never be Americans.”

“It seems as if more and more people are coming to understand that we are a distinct people who deserve to be able to determine our own destinies. It is becoming more and more clear that ameriKKKa does not accept us- it is at war with us. We must collectively realize, as Malcolm did, that 'we didn’t land on Plymouth rock, Plymouth rock landed on us.' We are not African-ameriKKKans, we are New Afrikans. We will fight till the bitter end for the liberation of our entire nation, and we will not integrate into a burning house!”

  • AFL-CIO: any union on this list is part of an organization which welcomes & defends cops. affiliated cop unions include:

  • SEIU. affiliated cop unions include:

    • NAGE (National Association of Government Employees)
  • Teamsters. they even wrote this:

    • “The Teamsters Union, which currently represents tens of thousands of law enforcement officers nationwide, recently convened a special meeting of law enforcement officers in Des Moines, Iowa...”
    • “the union provides access to a unique benefit for members: The Teamsters Legal Defense Fund (TLDF). The program provides legal representation and guidance to Teamster member participants in law enforcement with quality professional legal representation and stands by law enforcement Teamsters and their families when they need advice, guidance and comfort the most.”

the widespread presence of police & prison guards in major u.s. labor organizations flows from the white supremacist & patriarchal foundations of the unions, which have sought to keep non-whites (especially Black people) & gender-oppressed people from gaining a share of their colonial privileges.

further reading

  • settlers: the mythology of the white proletariat
  • cops in unions and the extension of the state
    • “Though police in the United States have developed their own organizations to protect their interests since the late 19th century, their entry and participation in the wider labor movement is a more recent development. For example, the International Union of Police Associations (IUPA) entered the AFL-CIO only in 1979; the International Brotherhood of Police Officers became an affiliate of SEIU only in 1982.”
  • AFL-CIA