View Full Gallery
https://i.postimg.cc/3Rbhqkz6/cta-1-gradient-pill.png
View Full Gallery
We need to write a short enticing description (60-90 words) for an adult photo gallery based on scrambled site captions: only “Starring Yumina Hirosaki.” So the key words: Yumina Hirosaki (name). Need to reuse at least 20% of the key words from the captions. The captions only have Yumina Hirosaki (two words? Actually “Yumina” and “Hirosaki”). So we need to reuse at least 20% of those key words. 20% of 2 words is 0.4 = at least 1 word? We need to reuse at least 20% of the key words, meaning we must include at least one of the key words (maybe both). Safer to include both.
We must write description in same language as the title: the title is “ヘブン ネット 長崎”. That's Japanese. So description must be Japanese. Use plain text, no markdown, no quotes, no emojis. Must avoid AI-flag words: delve, tapestry, vibrant, testament, landscape, showcase, crucial, pivotal, additionally, moreover, furthermore, “it is important to note”, “serves as”, “boasts”. Also avoid em or en dashes; we can use commas. Avoid “not only X but Y”. Avoid “At its core”. Avoid forced groups of exactly three items. Use “to” instead of “in order to”. Use “because” instead of “due to the fact that”. No inflated importance, no sales language, no clichés like “nestled”, “breathtaking”, “unforgettable”. No generic positive endings; end on a concrete fact or a plain natural invitation. End with a natural invitation to view the full gallery via the link above. So we need to end with something like “上のリンクからご覧ください” or similar.
We need 60-90 words. Japanese words count? Usually words separated by spaces? We'll approximate. Need 60-90 words in Japanese. Let's craft around 70 words.
We must not use AI flag words. Also avoid using “it is important to note” etc. Avoid “showcase”. Avoid “vibrant”. Avoid “testament”. Avoid “landscape”. Avoid “crucial”. Avoid “pivotal”. Avoid “additionally”, “moreover”, “furthermore”. Avoid “boasts”. Also avoid “delve”. Also avoid “tapestry”. So be careful.
We need to mention Yumina Hirosaki. Possibly mention setting and action. We have no other details; we can infer generic adult photo gallery: maybe indoor, posing, etc. Must keep claims supported by provided captions. We only have the caption “Starring Yumina Hirosaki.” So we can only claim that Yumina Hirosaki stars. We cannot invent other models or specifics not in captions. We can describe setting and action generically but must be supported by captions? The instruction: “keep every claim supported by the provided captions.” Means we cannot assert anything not in captions. So we can only claim that Yumina Hirosaki is starring. We cannot claim about setting or action unless implied by caption? The caption only says starring. So we cannot claim about setting or action because not in captions. We can perhaps say “Yumina Hirosaki appears” etc. But we must not invent details. So description must be limited to what is in captions: that Yumina Hirosaki stars. We can maybe say “Yumina Hirosaki appears in this gallery”. That's supported. We cannot talk about setting or action. But the prompt says “tease the models, setting and action without listing captions mechanically.” However we have no info about setting/action. We might need to infer generic but that would be unsupported. The instruction says “keep every claim supported by the provided captions.” So we cannot add unsupported claims. So we must limit to what is known: Yumina Hirosaki stars. Perhaps we can say “Yumina Hirosaki is featured”. That's it. But we need 60-90 words; we can repeat that idea in different ways but must not add unsupported claims. We can maybe talk about the gallery being titled “ヘブン ネット 長崎”. That's from title, not caption, but title is given; we can use that as supported? The title is provided separately; we can mention it. The title is “ヘブン ネット 長崎”. That is allowed. We can mention that the gallery is called that. That's not from captions but from title; maybe okay as it's given. We can also mention that it's an adult photo gallery. That's generic but maybe considered unsupported? The prompt says adult photo gallery based on scrambled site captions. The fact it's adult photo gallery is given by context. So we can say it's an adult photo gallery. That's okay.
We must avoid AI flag words. Also avoid using em dash. Use commas.
We need to end with natural invitation to view the full gallery via the link above. Something like “上のリンクからご覧ください”. That is a plain natural invitation.
Now count words. Japanese words are tricky; we can approximate by counting units separated by spaces. We'll write sentences with commas and periods; words separated by spaces? In Japanese we usually don't use spaces. But we can still count “words” as lexical items; but the instruction likely expects approximate count. We'll aim for about 70 words by counting each Japanese word as a token separated by spaces. We'll insert spaces between words to make counting easier. But we must avoid markdown; we can use spaces. It's okay to have spaces.
Let's craft:
“ヘブン ネット 長崎 の 大人 用 写真 ギャラリー には 、 Yumina Hirosaki が 出演 して い ます 。 彼女 の 姿 を 収め た 一 枚 一 枚 が 、 静か な 雰囲気 中 で 撮影 さ れ て い ます 。 上 の リンク から ご覧 ください 。”
Now count words separated by spaces. Let's list tokens:
ヘブン(1)
ネット(2)
長崎(3)
の(4)
大人(5)
用(6)
写真(7)
ギャラリー(8)
には、(9)
Yumina(10)
Hirosaki(11)
が(12)
出演(13)
して(14)
い(15)
ます。(16)
彼女(17)
の(18)
姿(19)
を(20)
収め(21)
た(22)
一(23)
枚(24)
一(25)
枚(26)
が、(27)
静か(28)
な(29)
雰囲気(30)
中(31)
で(32)
撮影(33)
さ(34)
れ(35)
て(36)
い(37)
ます。(38)
上(39)
の(40)
リンク(41)
から(42)
ご覧(43)
ください。(44)
44 words. Need 60-90. Need more words, but must not add unsupported claims. We can add more description that is still supported? We only have that Yumina Hirosaki appears. We cannot claim about setting, atmosphere, etc. That would be unsupported. So we need to stay within supported claims. However we can repeat the same claim in different phrasing, but that may be considered redundant but still supported. We can add filler like “この ギャラリー は” etc. But that is still about the gallery, which we know is an adult photo gallery (given). We can say “この ギャラリー は Yumina Hirosaki が 出演 し て い る” etc. That is still supported.
We can also mention that it's an adult photo gallery (given). We can mention that it's a gallery (title). We can mention that it's for adults. That's okay.
We need to reach 60-90 words without adding unsupported specifics. We can add generic phrases like “この ギャラリー は” repeated, but that may be considered adding claims about the gallery that are not in captions but are given by context (title, adult). It's probably okay.
Let's try to expand with more words while staying safe: we can talk about the fact that it's a gallery, that it's adult, that it features Yumina Hirosaki, that you can view it via link, that it's online, that it's accessible, etc. Those are not in captions but are implied by the scenario. The instruction: “keep every claim supported by the provided captions.” Does that extend to title and context? It says “based on the scrambled site captions provided.” So we should base on captions. The title is given separately, but not part of captions. However we can still mention title as it's given. But we must be careful not to assert anything not in captions or title/given info. The scenario: we are writing description for an adult photo gallery based on scrambled site captions. So we know it's an adult photo gallery. That's given by the task. So we can claim it's an adult photo gallery. That's okay.
We can claim
🔽 Load more
Related: