magda

25. [email protected]

With its initial release dating back to 1993, FreeBSD is a fork of 386BSD, which was a fork of the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD, initially called “Berkeley Unix”) developed by the Computer System Research Group at the University of California, Berkeley from 1978 to 1995. Despite not really known by its name outside of information technologies, this distribution powers gaming consoles, such as the Nintendo Switch and PlayStation 3 and 4, servers directly and via the distribution TrueNAS, and Darwin, the base for all operating systems developed and maintained by Apple, making it an “all-rounder” among operating systems.

It is said that FreeBSD shares many similarities with Linux, however main differences between the two are the project's scopes and licensing. While Linux is just a kernel with device drivers licensed under GPL 2.0, FreeBSD provides documentation and userland utilities alongside an own kernel and drivers, all licensed under a less-restrictive FreeBSD license that is incompatible with GPL, OSI, and Copyleft.

Taking both project's similarities into account, I assumed it would not be too hard to give FreeBSD a chance. My excitement, though, did not last long.

Read more...

The OpenBSD project produces a FREE, multi-platform 4.4BSD-based UNIX-like operating system. Our efforts emphasize portability, standardization, correctness, proactive security and integrated cryptography. As an example of the effect OpenBSD has, the popular OpenSSH software comes from OpenBSD.

Experience tells me that any operating system introducing itself by highlighting its influence and listing a bunch of buzzwords, chances are high that the OS sucks and hardly fulfills any of its promises. It's especially noticeable among most Linux distributions based on Ubuntu, which effectively are just Ubuntu with a slightly modified desktop environment. Although BSD appears to be much less popular than the ecosystem that is Linux, there has been a minor wave of distributions based on FreeBSD that provide nothing but macOS-like desktop themes, as well (looking at you, helloSystem).

OpenBSD, however, has been around since 1995, initially being just a simple fork of NetBSD, a fork of both BSD and 386BSD. Being completely unfamiliar with BSD, I decided to take as little risks as possible and installed OpenBSD in a virtual environment only – as it would turn out, I made the right decision to not test it on bare metal.

Read more...

Back in 2009, the antiX devs foresaw that usb flash drives would be the wave of the future for live Linux media. During the ensuing eight years antiX has been refining their live-usb technology striving to improve the live-usb experience and to find new and unique ways for making use of fast read-write live boot media.

Proudly calling itself “anti-fascist” and “systemd-free”, antiX is a Linux distribution not only aims to be used as a live USB system but also an extremely lightweight OS that can be run on very old machines such as “256MB old systems”. The rather bold claims don't end here, in fact “antiX can also be used as a fast-booting rescue cd and works extremely well running ‘live’ with or without ‘persistence’ on a usb stick or ‘frugal’ on a hard drive. Customize your own version with our live ‘remaster’ tools or create ‘snapshots’ of an installed system” with the project's so-called “antiX Magic”.

Read more...

Describing itself as “Debian without systemd”, Devuan is another distribution targeting users dissatisfied with the software suite originally developed by Lennart Poettering that would replace SysV as the most popular init system for Linux distributions. With the initial announcement of forking Debian dating back to late-2014, the team behind Devuan believes that GNU/Linux is becoming more homogenized not just as a result of the rising popularity of systemd but also the GNOME Project providing the GNOME desktop environment:

We believe this situation is also the result of a longer process leading to the take-over of Debian by the GNOME project agenda. Considering how far this has propagated today and the importance of Debian as a universal OS and base system in the distribution panorama, what is at stake is the future of GNU/Linux in a scenario of complete homogeneization (sic!) and lock-in of all base distributions.

In short, this means that Devuan is supposed to be a “less-restricted” variant of Debian with free choice over init system and desktop environment. As this is more of a political justification rather than fears born out of potential technical implications, testing the OS myself was... rather boring, despite conducting this test in a badly-configured virtual machine.

Read more...

Artix, calling itself “Arch Linux without systemd”, is a project I've had my eyes on since I got into Linux two years ago and gave a quick spin myself before eventually settling with EndeavourOS for over half a year. Back then, I would let its s6 variant run within a virtual environment and was pleasantly surprised that it would work very smoothly even with little hardware resources provided. My test, however, came to a sudden stop when pacman stopped fetching updates out of the blue and repeatedly stated that the system was up to date, despite being at least three kernels behind.

And because two years have passed since that incident, I decided to give Artix another shot.

Read more...

Certainly a niche within a niche, ArchLabs is supposed to be a homage to the Debian-based BunsenLabs, which is regarded by few users as being an unofficial successor to CrunchBang. As a very tiny project led by two developers, ArchLabs is not widely known among Linux users, currently holding the 80th spot on DistroWatch's Page Hit Ranking, also due to targeting intermediate and advanced users that already are familiar with Arch Linux.

After my quarrels with Archcraft, which also promises to be a minimal distribution, I decided to give ArchLabs another chance, after encountering some issues with its installer back in 2020.

Read more...

Despite initially planning on not wanting to test any new version of Archcraft due to Adi, its sole developer, never providing a solid reason why users should get rid of the old version of his distribution and install “New Archcraft”, I had to download a new ISO to be able to chroot into my installed version, as “old Archcraft” does not tolerate chrooting from another Arch-based distribution such as EndeavourOS, warning me that the live user is not allowed to gain access to passwd. Never having encountered such incompatibilities between two Arch-based distributions, I was wondering if “New Archcraft” suffers from the same issues I would encounter within a year of using this distribution.

But not only were my low expectations proven to be justified, the project's main community channel on Discord is largely being used by its developer to beg for money and to be arrogant towards other Linux distributions.

Read more...

Some distributions gain a small, yet quite vocal fan following for reasons users tend to barely address or explain in such a way that makes those interested feel... quite stupid about themselves. NixOS is described as “a Linux distribution with a special approach to package and configuration management”, meaning its sole selling point is its unique package management called Nix and thus largely aimed at developers. Still, even more specialized distributions with the look-and-feel of a regular Desktop distribution for personal usage should be able to handle passive users just wanting to browse the web.

Read more...

It is more than fair to criticize Google and its services for violating data privacy en masse and it is also fair to mock Apple Maps for plain wrong entries, so it might come as a surprise to those using the free “alternative”, OpenStreetMaps (OSM), is a confusing a badly-maintained mess.

OSM behaves similar to Wikipedia, though with two significant differences:

  1. OSM is more open to primary (local) sources,
  2. OSM isn't actually meant to be an alternative to Google Maps and avoids standardization.

The latter is the most important point, which explains the lack of adaptation among sole users and those wanting to contribute to it. Especially smaller villages will take the short end of the stick, should interested inhabitants decide to contribute themselves.

Read more...

Last year, I published a brief review of the Arch-based distribution Archcraft on Medium. Shortly afterwards, its sole developer released a new version dubbed “New Archcraft”, which would break with all previous releases and thus require a fresh install. At that time, I was unaware how deep some issues of the original Archcraft ran, as I currently am finding out.

Read more...