The five-arch stone bridge at Pakenham, Mississippi Mills, Lanark County, Ontario. Photo: P199, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Lead image is illustrative; not the McKinnon lot.
Three Generations on Lot 9
A McKinnon family, Bridgeton to Dalhousie Township, 1821–1935
Rev 14 — 2026-10-02. Track 1: the narrative. Track 2: sources, credits, and the seams left open on purpose.
1. Three names on a roll
They were counted before they were known. That is what an emigrant roll is: a town's worth of people decided to leave, and a clerk reduces each of them to a name, an age, and a place in a line.
This sheet is one society's list, all of it certified for one ship. Three consecutive lines:
McKinnon, Donald, 58.
McKinnon, John, 21.
McKinnon, John, 60.
Three McKinnons, one ship: the George Canning, out of Greenock in April 1821. That is everything the page says about how they are related to each other. Three consecutive lines are page order, not kinship: they sit next to each other because a clerk wrote them next to each other, and the form had no field for a father, a brother, or a son.
What the page does give me is a hard edge. Donald is fifty-eight; the older John is sixty. A man of sixty is not old enough to be the father of a man of fifty-eight. So the two older men are not father and son. They are near-contemporaries, two years apart, walking the same gangway on the same day. And no document anywhere says what they were to each other. Their land in Dalhousie lies in the same corner of the township, which is a hint at kin and nothing firmer; and there the trail stops, in the Scottish mists where the records for people like them were never made. That is a fact, and I would rather speak it than paper over it: the relationship between the older John and Donald is undocumented. Bennett, who gathered these settlers into his register, offers a guess, and a guess is what it is.
There is a reason this roll is dated 1821 and not 1815, and it is the war. Britain finally put down Napoleon in 1815, and peace sounds like a good year for everybody. For a handloom weaver in Glasgow it was the opposite. That is the post-war crisis the emigrants were living through: demobilized soldiers flooded back to the towns, trade routes reopened to foreign cloth, and the bottom fell out of the trade that had kept Lanarkshire fed. A weaver who had once been a skilled man with his own loom and his own hours slid into a wage that could not cover bread. The Bridgeton Canadian Emigration Society was a weavers' answer to that: men from the trade pooling what they had, chartering ships, and moving a whole company of families out of Glasgow and Lanark to the woods of Upper Canada, because staying was starving slower.
So this was not one family leaving. It was a trade leaving. And of the three McKinnons on the page, two I can follow. Donald goes on. The young John, twenty-one, goes on. The older John is on the roll and then he is gone: Bennett's register records him flat, died shortly after arriving in Canada. He was counted onto a ship at Bridgeton with a wife and three children, assigned a lot at the end of a wagon road, and did not live to work it. Where and of what he died, the register does not say; the fever that ran through the depot camps is the likeliest reading, and I mark it as a reading, not a record.
Everything after this page belongs to the two who lived.
2. The road
Nobody in the family wrote the crossing down. There is no letter, no diary, no page where a McKinnon says what the water was like, or what they ate, or what they were afraid of. That silence is not a gap I can fill from the family's side. It is a fact about who leaves a record and who does not.
But the road itself is in print, written by a man who walked it the same year. John McDonald, another 1821 emigrant out of the same Glasgow society, published his Narrative of a Voyage to Quebec in 1823, and it is the closest thing I have to standing on the deck with them.
McDonald's account, in brief: Greenock to Quebec in thirty-seven days. A steamboat up to Montreal, a day and a night of it. Then the hard part. Bateaux, flat-bottomed and overloaded, poled and rowed up the river and through the rapids, six nights camped in open fields between La Chine and Prescott, the passengers living out of the boats and off whatever they carried with them. At Prescott they were put into tents and left there for three weeks while fever ran through the camp — the bloody flux — and a good many died in the field. Then seventy-four miles of wagon road, through mud, to the settlement, where Colonel Marshall stood at the end of it handing out lot tickets.
This is not the McKinnons' road. McDonald sailed a different ship and belonged to a different society, and I will not put his words in their mouths. But the bateaux were the same bateaux, the tents the same row of tents, the mud the same mud, and fever did not read the passenger list before it chose. The McKinnons travelled a road that ran through it, and the road asked things of them that no document will hand me.
How Donald, at fifty-eight, worked the brutal physics of the St. Lawrence rapids. How he held a family together through three weeks in a canvas tent at Prescott while the bloody flux killed the people in the tents around them. Then seventy-four miles of mud road to Dalhousie, a lot ticket from Colonel Marshall's hand, and a forest he was now expected to clear with an axe, at fifty-eight. We know he did it, because everything after this page depends on it. What it cost him was not written down, and I will not invent it to make the crossing feel fuller than it was.
3. The house on the sheet
By 1851 the household is legible. First, though, the naming, because there are two Johns on that roll and the reader should not have to sort them out alone. They stand in a fixed order on the page: the young man of twenty-one first, higher up; the man of sixty second, below him. First and second here mean the order of the sheet, nothing more. The John on this 1851 page is the younger one — the single twenty-one-year-old who stepped off the George Canning with a name and no household — thirty years on, now fifty-two, married to Ann Stuart, and the father of ten children.
The census of Canada West, Dalhousie Township, page 43, writes them down. Twelve people under one roof: John, 52; Ann, 44; ten children, the eldest a labourer of twenty-four, the youngest five. The enumerator wrote down the house as well as the people, and that is the detail that stays with me. A log house. One storey. One family.
A census name is the enumerator's hearing of what a household said, and two of the ten come down to me more than one way. I keep both readings and let the disagreement stand (Track 2).
So picture the winter in it. Twelve people in a single room of squared logs, in a township that was still mostly stump and brush. No hall to cross, no second room to send a coughing child to, the fire at one end and the door at the other, and everything the family owned within a few steps of the table. The same room where the baby was born and where the old ones would be laid out. That crowded, ordinary, one-room world is what holds the next thirty years of this story.
The same year, the agricultural schedule names the ground under that floor. John McKinnon, concession 10, west half of lot 9: two hundred acres held, about a hundred and thirty under crop or pasture, seventy still in wood. Thirty years after the roll, that is what this family had wrestled out of the bush: two-thirds of a farm, a third still standing as the forest it had been.
4. The lot, settled
For a while, the farm had two addresses.
Bennett's register gives John one lot: the east half of lot 8, concession 11. The 1851 agricultural schedule puts the household on the west half of lot 9, concession 10. Same man, two pieces of ground, one concession apart. I could not say which was the farm.
The 1861 agricultural schedule settled it, with a line in the enumerator's hand: John McKinnon, concession 10, lot 9, 200 acres. Same concession, same lot, ten years on. Two returns from two census years put the family on Lot 9, Concession 10, and one register puts them somewhere else. The register is the odd one out.
And once the lot is fixed, the ground under it opens. The lot Bennett's register gives Donald is the east half of lot 9, concession 10 — the other half of the same lot the 1851 sheet puts John on. This is where the arithmetic earns its keep, because a lot and a half on one page need not be a contradiction. A Dalhousie township lot was laid out as a two-hundred-acre block, and the grant to a settler of the 1821 society was a hundred acres — half a lot, not a whole one. That was the rule the Glasgow weavers emigrated under: a hundred acres a family. So the grid is two-hundred-acre lots, dealt out in half-lot pieces. Donald's grant is the east half of lot 9, concession 10, a hundred acres; the west half of the same lot is the other hundred.
Line the two schedules up, and watch what does and does not move. The acreage does not: two hundred acres held in 1851, two hundred in 1861. What moves is the description. In 1851 the sheet names only the west half of lot 9 — one hundred acres — and yet credits John with two hundred held. Either the enumerator wrote the whole-lot figure beside a half-lot description, a clerical slip of the kind these sheets are full of, or John was already working both halves and the census caught him mid-consolidation. By 1861 the whole lot stands under his name, which tilts it toward the second reading: the son's farm had reached onto his father's half, the hundred acres of Donald's grant, and by 1861 the whole lot was his. That is not proof of a handover. It is the shape the ground takes if the handover happened.
And the parentage no longer rests on the land alone. The parish record of Barony, in Lanarkshire, names the christening of John, son of Donald McKinnon and Elizabeth McGregor, on 23 February 1800. Donald was still in Scotland when that son was born, and that son is the twenty-one-year-old on the George Canning. So I will state it instead of hinting at it: the young John on the roll is Donald's son, and the two half-lots thirty years later were not two neighbours by chance but a father and his son on the two halves of the same ground.
One limit, so the title claims nothing it cannot: the schedules place John on Lot 9. They do not place his son or his grandson there. The parcel belongs to one generation of the family, and this paper follows the family.
5. What the county buried
Before Hugh's own story, there is a room worth standing in.
Twelve people, one log house, one storey, 1851: a father, a mother, and ten children. That was not misfortune in Dalhousie Township. It was the normal shape of a family, and the reason it reads as precarious now is that we know what was moving through the county in those years, and the people inside the room did not.
The two great child-killers of the Canada West of those years were diphtheria and scarlet fever. Diphtheria was new to the record in the way that mattered: it emerged as an epidemic disease in the late 1850s, doctors spent the 1860s arguing over whether it was even a separate disease from a bad croup, and it was routinely confused with scarlet fever at the bedside. Both moved through rural Ontario in winter waves, when families were packed indoors and one infected throat had a houseful of targets. In Canada, diphtheria stayed one of the most common killers of children until the 1930s, when antitoxin and then immunization finally broke it.
Then there was the water. No record describes this farm's water, and I will not invent it. But the general shape for a log farmhouse on cleared acres is a shallow dug well and a privy, close together because hauling water is work. The runoff did the rest. Typhoid fever, spread by water carrying human waste, was endemic in rural Ontario and did not care how many acres a man held.
So the twelve people in that room were not living in a house. They were living with the sickness always somewhere close — not a disaster that arrives one day, but a presence already in the water they drew and the air they breathed all winter. Every season a throat would start somewhere on the concession. Every spring the well came up with whatever the ground had been given all winter. Most years nothing happened, and the record of that is silence, which is why we call it luck and the family would have called it Tuesday.
I want to be careful here, because the easy sentence is that the family survived the wilderness, and it is half true and half a lie. What they survived was the same thing every family on the concession survived, at the same odds. The difference between the household that buried two children and the household that buried five was mostly which well they had and which winter it was. The resilience is real. It just wasn't special, and that is the thing a record cannot show: this was ordinary, and ordinary was the danger.
And then the record handed me one family out of the odds. It is in the next section, because I want it standing on its own: not a statistic about the county, a named form about two boys in one house.
6. Hugh
Hugh McKinnon was one of the ten children in that room. By the family's record he was born in the autumn of 1835, the fourth of the children the household names, which makes him a boy in that log house when the 1851 enumerator wrote the family down: one of the bodies the single room had to hold, one of the throats the winter air reached. He grew up inside the arithmetic of §5. Log walls, a crowded room, the county's coughs coming through the door every year. Long before Hugh McKinnon was a name on a marriage register, he was a boy in the noise of Lot 9.
In the spring of 1858, twenty-two years old, he stepped out of that crowded house into one of his own. On the Queen's birthday, the twenty-fourth of May, he married Mary Ann Dickson — set down in the record as Margaret, a disagreement I come back to. And when he stood before the minister he gave his mother's name as Annie Stewart, and that name does more than confirm a parent. Annie Stewart is Ann Stuart, one woman under two spellings, and she was the wife of the John christened in Barony in 1800, not the wife of the sixty-year-old who had walked the gangway beside Donald. So the record points past the older John of the roll and lands on Donald's son. Hugh's father is John; John's father is Donald. The middle of the spine is no longer inference. He was the grandson of the old weaver from the Barony, carrying the line forward into a new concession.
Over the next twenty-five years they had twelve children, their names and dates held in the family's own record and not all of them in any register. A few of the twelve are the ones the documents here will speak to.
Hold one thing from that entry, and hold it as a disagreement rather than a detail. The entry calls the bride Margaret Dickson. Every later document for her, and the family's own record, calls her Mary Ann. I will not pick a favourite and I will not average them. Her own death certificate decides it, and that certificate is the best-papered moment in this whole file.
Mary Ann died on 7 August 1916, and the form did its work. It gives her at lot 7, concession 10, Palmerston Township, in Frontenac County — not Dalhousie, not Lanark, a different county altogether, which tells me the couple had left the lot and the township by then. It gives her age to the month and the day, seventy-seven years and seven months, married, the cause written as myocarditis, a heart failing over years. It names her father, James Dickson, set down there as Dixon — one man under two spellings. It names her mother, Mary Bygrove, written short where the family's own record has Mary Ann. And it names the informant, the person who stood before the registrar and answered for her: Hugh McKinnon, her husband, of Mississippi. So James Dickson stands on the 1858 marriage and on the 1916 death, fifty-eight years apart, and Hugh is at both ends of it. That is how the Margaret of the marriage entry and the Mary Ann of every other page become one woman — not by squinting at the letters, but by a father's name and a husband's name holding still across six decades.
Then read the dates down the list and a different document appears.
David, born March 1867. Jacob, born May 1868. Both die on the same day, 6 December 1869 — a two-and-a-half-year-old and a one-and-a-half-year-old, carried out of the same house in the same week. Then Isabella Marion, born 1880, dead at nearly three. Then Robert, born 1874, gone at twenty-six in 1900. Twelve children, and one of them, Duncan, born 1883, would live to 1972 and carry the family into a century the others never saw.
Hugh had grown up inside a room that held twelve. Then he built his own, and it did not hold. That is the shape of the second generation: the man who left the crowded house to make a safer one, and lost two children in it the same week.
There is a page for that week, and I went and read it. Ontario's 1871 census took a mortality schedule, the nominal return of deaths in the twelve months before the count. On that form, District No. 80, Sub-District G, two consecutive lines: McKinnon, David, male, 3, died December, scarlet fever; McKinnon, Jacob, male, 1, died December, scarlet fever. That is not the county's general odds. That is the boys' own house, in the enumerator's hand, with the enumerator's own name for what took them.
The day comes from the stone. At Crawford Cemetery, Elphin, the family monument stands in plot 15 and carries four faces. One names Jacob McKinnon, died 6 December 1869, aged 1 year 7 months. Another names David McKinnon, died 6 December 1869, aged 2 years 9 months. Run the arithmetic and it closes: David, born March 1867, plus two years nine months lands in December 1869; Jacob, born May 1868, plus one year seven months lands in the same month. Same day, same sickness, one house, one grave.
The census form and the headstone slide past each other by a year, and the form's own rules explain it. The mortality schedule counted deaths in the twelve months before the count — April 1870 to April 1871 — so the only December its window contained was December 1870. The boys died in December 1869, just outside it; when the family reported a December death that spring, the form had nowhere to put it but the December in front of it. A year slipped in the reporting, not in the ground. I go with the stone, and the arithmetic is why a stranger can check it: the ages cut into the granite put David at two years nine months and Jacob at one year seven, and both land in December 1869. I print the stone's date and footnote the form, and I leave the one-year gap where it stands.
There is nothing in any register about what that December cost them, and that blank is the honest center of this family's first century in Canada. The record gives me the arithmetic of the losses. It gives me nothing of the grief, because grief is exactly the kind of thing a form has no field for.
7. John (Jack)
The third generation arrives through the eldest of Hugh's children — the firstborn, John, always “Jack,” a nickname doing necessary work in a family with two earlier Johns behind it, so that a household could call one man's name and mean one man.
On the 1889 marriage register for Dalhousie and North Sherbrooke, Jack McKinnon, 29, marries Matilda McDonald, 24. The register names both fathers and both mothers, which is the gift: Hugh McKinnon and Mary Ann Dickson, written down at the marriage of their son. That ties Jack to Hugh by a primary document. And the joint above it, the one I used to have to name as a gap, now carries a record of its own: the 1858 Lanark marriage, read in §6, gives Hugh's parents as John McKinnon and Annie Stewart — which is to say the John of 1800, Ann Stuart's husband, and not the older John of the roll. So the chain runs Jack to Hugh to John to Donald, one document at every link, and a stranger can walk it.
But a marriage register is administrative dust if it stops at being a link. So here is the man on the other side of it. Jack was a farmer, recorded as one on the 1891 and 1901 census forms. The forms give the trade and the township, not the lot, so I cannot put his acres under his grandfather's by name; what I can say is that he farmed in the same township his people had broken. He and Matilda raised nine children, seven daughters and two sons by the obituary, which means the one-room arithmetic of 1851 was still running a full generation later, this time in a farmhouse full of daughters.
Then Matilda died, in December 1917, at fifty-three, the Great War in its last year and the farmhouse emptied of the woman who had filled it for nearly thirty years. On seven July 1920, aged sixty-one, Jack married again: a widow named Helen Goodwin, born in Scotland, the daughter of Jerome Christie and Jessie Ingram. Nearly a century after his great-grandfather Donald left the Scottish weaving districts behind, a woman born in the old country married into a household that had been Canadian for a hundred years. Whether she outlived him the records I hold do not say, so I do not claim it.
Jack McKinnon died at McDonald's Corners in the autumn of 1935, on 24 October, at seventy-five, and is buried at Crawford with Matilda, who went in 1917. Three generations, three men named John — a family that would rather reuse a name than invent one, which is its own kind of stubbornness in a new country where nobody was keeping score.
8. What the records carry, and what they don't
Put the spine end to end: the roll of 1821, three McKinnons on one ship; the 1851 census and the farm schedule, one household and its ground; the 1858 marriage, naming Hugh's parents; the 1889 register, naming Hugh and Mary Ann at their son's marriage. Every joint from Jack back to Donald now rests on a document, not an inference.
What the records carry is the tally. The crossing, tallied. The acres, tallied. The children, tallied, and the dead children, tallied. What they don't carry is the living. Not one sentence in the whole paper trail says what John felt leaving Bridgeton, or what Ann thought in a one-room log house with ten children and a forest out the door, or what Hugh and Mary Ann said to each other the week they buried David and Jacob together.
That's not a hole in the story. It's the shape of the story. I can prove the family lived and I can prove half of them died young and I can put the exact acreage under their feet. The rest stayed in the room with them and went down with them, and the honest thing is to say so and stand next to the blank rather than fill it with something prettier.
And one blank sits above all the others, and it belongs to the man who starts the file. Donald is the first McKinnon I can name: christened in Barony, married twice, counted onto the 1821 roll, handed the east half of lot 9, alive long enough to see his son work it. There is no record of his death. The family's account is that he was buried on the ground he cleared, in a township where no minister rode out to keep the register, and that the year survives in memory and nowhere else. Unless a Presbyterian minister's book turns up with his name in it, that is where it stays: family record, never a document. So the first name in the file is also its deepest silence. The man the records name all his life leaves them not one line for the end of it, and I write it down as what it is.
Set that against the woman Donald's grandson married. Donald goes to the ground without a line. Mary Ann Dickson dies in 1916 and the state writes down the exact lot, the age to the month, the father's name, the cause, the husband standing there to answer for her. One generation sits between those two ends, and the difference is not that the McKinnons became important. It is that somebody had started keeping the book. In the backwoods of the 1850s, for people like Donald, there was no form to fill and no registrar to fill it. By 1916 Ontario had built the machinery, and Mary Ann's death is a paragraph because the machinery caught her. Donald's is a silence because there was nothing there to catch him. The records did not get better and they did not get kinder. They got more complete, and the completeness is the only reason one of them left a paper trail and the other left a story.
— Cosmo. Sources and image credits follow.
Sources, Credits, and Method
Every claim above is meant to trace to a line below; where a joint rests on the family's record instead, the text says so.
I. Primary records
1. The 1821 emigrant roll (the three McKinnons)
– The Lanark Society Settlers: Ships' Lists of the Glasgow Emigration Society 1821, ed. Gerald J. Neville (Ottawa: British Isles Family History Society of Greater Ottawa, 1995; repr. 2012), ISBN 978-1-926797-62-5. Section: “Abstract of the Bridgeton Canadian Society's emigrants on the George Canning.”
– The catalogue entry, read directly: Library and Archives Canada, “Immigrants before 1865,” MG 11, CO 42, “Q” Series, vol. 159, pt. 3, page 507, list 2, microfilm reel C-11930. Three consecutive items on that page: Donald McKinnon, 58 (item 13); John McKinnon, 21 (item 14); John McKinnon, 60 (item 15). Signed Robert Lamond, Sect., Glasgow, 13 April 1821.
– Read as: three McKinnons, one ship, one society, all three carrying an age. The catalogue is an index — name, age, page, volume, item — with no relationship field and no lot column. The three ages are the only structured facts about the men; the page sequence is not a family.
– Note on the volume seam: an earlier citation of “CO 42/189” was wrong and is corrected here. The roll sits at vol. 159, pt. 3; the family's own photographs of the catalogue entries (Donald, John 21, John 60) fix the page and list, and the FamilySearch image set agrees on “MG 11, CO 42, vol. 159, page 507, list 2.” Family photographs of the three entries: IMG1668 (Donald), IMG1669 (John 21), IMG1671 (John 60); IMG1670 was a duplicate.
2. The settler register (the lots and the death)
– Carol Bennett, The Lanark Society Settlers, 1820–1821 (Renfrew, Ont.: Juniper Books, 1991; republished Milton: Global Heritage Press, 2012), pp. 73–74, entries:
– McKinnon, Donald — Ship: George Canning, 1821. Location: East lot 9, con 10, Dalhousie Township. Wife and three children.
– John McKinnon Sr — George Canning, 1821. Location: East lot 11, con 11, Dalhousie Township. Wife and three children. “John McKinnon died shortly after arriving in Canada.“
– John McKinnon Jr, c1799–1880 — George Canning, 1821. Location: East lot 8, con 11, Dalhousie Twp. “Single on arrival but married Ann Stuart.” Children in the 1851 census: “Donald; Flora; John; Hugh; Ronald; Jacob; James; David; Margaret; Elizabeth.”
– Bennett also states plainly that on this roll “junior and senior did not always denote father and son” and that his own reading is that John Jr was a son of Donald, not of John Sr. That is a secondary-source opinion, and I flag it as such in Track 1, §1.
3. The Barony parish register — the father named
– Church of Scotland, parish of Barony (Lanarkshire), christening 23 February 1800: John, son of Donald McKinnon and Elizabeth McGregor. Read via the Scotland's People index (parish 622, Barony; the register image itself I have not viewed — the index names the parents, which is the fact used here; the register is the primary and I name the gap rather than hide it).
– Companion entry, same parish: Donald McKinnon m. Sarah Cunningham, 4 June 1809, Barony (index, Church of Scotland marriages). The second marriage fixes Elizabeth McGregor's death before June 1809 and confirms Donald's presence in Barony across the decade. It names no parents, so it does not touch the question of how the older John stood to Donald.
4. The 1851 census of Canada West — the household
– Population schedule, Dalhousie Township, Page 43, lines 1–12. Household of John McKinnon: twelve souls under one roof; house described as a one-storey log house, one family. Ages as read from the sheet: John 52; Ann 44; ten children, eldest 24 — the eldest written with the occupation labourer.
– Note on the read: earlier readings of the family's phone photographs of this sheet put two of the children's forenames as Arch'd and Lauchlin. Checked against the handwritten page, neither name is there — both belong to the neighbouring households on the same sheet (Archibald recurs among the Gardners and McDougalls, Lauchlin among the McDougalls and Duncans), and I withdraw the reading. A third forename came back from my own read of the photographs as something other than Jacob; the page itself reads Jacob, and that machine reading is withdrawn with the others. The children stand as the family's record and Bennett's list carry them.
5. The agricultural schedules — the ground
– 1851, schedule of agriculture, Dalhousie Township (LAC microfilm C-11731, district 2, p. 67, line 39): John McKinnon, concession 10, west half of lot 9; 200 acres held, ~130 acres under crop or pasture, ~70 acres still in wood.
– 1861, schedule of agriculture, Dalhousie Township, enumeration district 35: John McKinnon, concession 10, lot 9, 200 acres. Read directly from the digitized microfilm: LAC microfilm C-1043, digitized image set 4391558, Dalhousie agricultural pages 85–89 (images 4391558_00514 to 4391558_00522). Item-level image locators published by the Heritage Property Index (ontario.heritagepin.com); verified against the LAC scan at data2.collectionscanada.gc.ca.
– The two schedules, ten years apart, agree: lot 9, concession 10, 200 acres. This closes the lot seam (Track 1, §4). Cross-reference to Bennett (#2): the lot Bennett's register gives Donald is the east half of lot 9, con 10 — the other half of the same lot.
– The acreage arithmetic — rule corrected. The 1821 society's grant was 100 acres a settler, half of a 200-acre township lot; the Dalhousie grid was laid out in 200-acre blocks and dealt out in half-lot pieces. Donald's grant is the east half of lot 9, con 10 ≈ 100 acres (a first, still-unverified read of the OnLand abstract shows the east half's first patent as Donald M'Kinnon, 100 acres, 1837). The 1851 schedule names only the west half of lot 9, yet credits John with 200 acres held and ~130 cleared — more than a half. So the seam narrows to a named either/or: an enumerator's clerical figure, or John already holding both halves. The reading in Track 1 §4 (father's grant consolidating into the son) is labelled there as a reading, not a surveyed fact. The parcel paper that would settle it beyond doubt is the full abstract for the west half of lot 9, con 10 — partly read, not resolved; the west half's first patent does not read as a McKinnon on the current scan.
6. The 1889 marriage register — the link back
– Ontario marriage register, Dalhousie and North Sherbrooke, 1889: John McKinnon (“Jack”), 29, to Matilda McDonald, 24. The register names both fathers and both mothers, recording Hugh McKinnon and Mary Ann Dickson as the groom's parents. This is the joint that ties generation three to generations one and two.
6a. The 1858 marriage register (index) — Hugh's parents
– Ontario marriage register, Lanark, 24 May 1858: Hugh McKinnon, 22, of Dalhousie, to Margaret Dickson. Groom's parents named: John McKinnon and Annie Stewart (Ann Stuart). Read via index; the original register image sits behind a paywall and has not been viewed — that gap is named in Track 1 §6, §7 and §V. The record's forename for the bride (Margaret) is the variant; see 6b.
– Note on the age: the index gives Hugh as 22, which places his birth in 1835–36 and agrees with the headstone's 1835 (year drift of the usual kind).
6b. The 1916 death registration — Mary Ann, and the seam closed
– Ontario civil death registration, 7 August 1916, lot 7, concession 10, Palmerston Township, Frontenac County: Mary Ann McKinnon, aged 77 years 7 months, married; cause, myocarditis; father, James Dickson, set down as Dixon (the spelling varies across the records); mother, Mary Bygrove (the family's own record gives Mary Ann); informant Hugh McKinnon, of Mississippi.
– This closes the 1858 Margaret / Mary Ann seam: the same father, James Dickson, stands on both records, and Hugh is the informant on the death, so the two entries are one woman. The variant spelling is named rather than smoothed (Track 1 §6).
7. The 1871 census mortality schedule — the boys' cause
– Census of Canada, 1871, Schedule No. 2, “Nominal Return of the Deaths within the last twelve months,” District No. 80, Sub-District G (Dalhousie and North Sherbrooke), p. 1. Rows: McKinnon, David, m, 3, December, scarlet fever; McKinnon, Jacob, m, 1, December, scarlet fever. Reproduced for illustration from the family's own reading of the microfilmed page. Used in Track 1, §6. (Year note: the form's nominal window, back from the 2 April 1871 count, would read this December as 1870; the headstone and the stated ages place it in 1869. See §V.)
8. The headstone — the boys' date
– Crawford Cemetery, Elphin, Dalhousie Township, Lanark County, plot 15: the McKinnon family monument. Faces read: Hugh McKinnon 1835–1919 and Mary A. Dixon 1838–1916; Jacob McKinnon, d. 6 Dec 1869, aged 1 yr 7 mos; David McKinnon, d. 6 Dec 1869, aged 2 yrs 9 mos; Robert McKinnon, d. 28 Oct 1900, aged 26. Transcribed at Find a Grave memorials 54270121 (David) and 54269894 (Jacob), contributor “Darb,” added 29 June 2010; the memorial pages also index the boys' births (David, March 1867; Jacob, May 1868). Reproduced as a photograph from the family's own collection, credited “photographer unknown” (pre-1929).
9. Jack's second chapter — the later registers
– Ontario marriage register, 7 July 1920: John McKinnon, 61, widower, to Helen Goodwin, widow, born Scotland, daughter of Jerome Christie and Jessie Ingram.
– 1891 and 1901 census of Canada, Dalhousie: John McKinnon, occupation farmer.
– Death record of John (“Jack”) McKinnon, d. 24 October 1935, McDonald's Corners; and of Matilda McKinnon, d. December 1917, aged 53. Obituary naming nine children (seven daughters, two sons).
– Crawford Cemetery (Dalhousie Township) burial records, for the John/Ann, Jack/Matilda, and Jack/Helen burials cited in Track 1.
– Ontario vital registrations: death record of John McKinnon (d. 14 Nov 1880, Elphin, Dalhousie Twp.).
II. Contextual source (the crossing)
10. John McDonald, Narrative of a Voyage to Quebec in the Year 1821 (1823).
– A first-hand account by a fellow passenger of the same 1821 emigration, from a different ship and society. Used in Track 1, §2 only as the documented shape of the road, attributed to McDonald by name, never placed in the McKinnons' mouths. Greenock→Quebec 37 days; steamboat to Montreal; bateaux up-river; six nights in open fields between La Chine and Prescott; tents and fever at Prescott; 74-mile wagon road to the settlement.
11. Lamond's 1821 Narrative / committee minutes (Trades House Library, Glasgow).
– The Glasgow Emigration Society committee's own minutes: the owners' certificate that the George Canning was “strong and staunch,” the thank-you letter from the ship's heads of families, and the committee's closing report (“four chartered vessels... 1883 souls”). Used for the administrative shape of the crossing and the 1883 aggregate figure.
III. Contextual sources: the county's diseases
General context for Track 1, §5. These describe what was killing children across Ontario in the 1860s. They are not this family's record.
12. Diphtheria in Canada.
– Pottie K. et al., “Facing a diphtheria outbreak,” Canadian Medical Association Journal (2002), PMC116646: diphtheria was “one of the most common killers of children in Canada” until the 1930s.
– “How Science Conquered Diphtheria, the Plague Among Children,” Smithsonian Magazine: diphtheria emerged as an epidemic disease in the late 1850s and was frequently confused with croup and scarlet fever in the 1860s.
– Typhoid's water route (shallow wells contaminated by privy runoff) is standard public-health history; cited here as general context only.
13. Context, not the proof. None of the sources above states what killed David and Jacob McKinnon; they only describe the diseases moving through Ontario in those years. The proof for this family is the 1871 mortality schedule (record 7) and the headstone (record 8).
IV. Secondary and working sources
14. The family tree — a private GEDCOM export (“McKinnon Line Audit and Validation Family Tree,” ~9,064 individuals), supplied by the family. Used in Track 1 for birth/marriage/death dates, then checked against the primary records above. The tree is the map; the records are the ground. Where they disagree, the record wins and the seam is named.
15. Published indices consulted — Bennett (as above); BIFHSGO (as above); the Lanark & Renfrew Herald sailing notice (489 passengers, George Canning, sailed 13–14 April 1821); Godfrey's table (Ontario History) of Quebec arrivals for the George Canning.
V. What I could not verify, and I say so
- The relationship of the three McKinnons on the roll. No document states how the older John stood to Donald. Their two ages (60 and 58) rule out a father-son tie between them; the land puts them in one kin cluster; the rest is undocumented, and the family records that would hold it were never kept for people in their position. Bennett offers a reasoned guess (seam A). I present it as a guess, and I say in the text that the silence is the finding.
- The Barony register image. The 1800 christening naming Donald as John's father is read from the Scotland's People index; the register page itself is the primary and I have not viewed it. The tie is stated in Track 1 §4 as the index states it, with that gap named here.
- Donald's death. No source record of it exists, and none is expected. In the backwoods of Dalhousie in the 1850s the dead were commonly buried on the farm, and no Presbyterian minister rode the concession to keep a register; the family's account has Donald buried on his own ground. His year of death comes from the family's record alone and is used in Track 1 §8 as family memory, never as a document. If a minister's book surfaces with his name in it, this is the line to correct.
- Hugh to John and Ann — closed at index level. The 1858 Lanark marriage index names Hugh's parents as John McKinnon and Annie Stewart (Ann Stuart), which places him as the son of the John of 1800, not the older John of the roll. Read from the index; the 1858 register image itself is not viewed and is named as the remaining seam (Track 1 §6, §7). The 1889 register and the family's record still support the same link independently.
- The 1916 death registration. Read from the family's photograph of the record. The father's name and the informant's name are clear and are what close the Margaret / Mary Ann seam. The mother's name is read as Mary Bygrove, written short against the family's Mary Ann; the father's surname is spelled Dixon here and Dickson on the 1858 marriage.
- The 1851 household count — resolved. Bennett's list of John Jr's children by the 1851 census carries ten names, and the sheet carries ten. The seam was the eldest, written with the occupation labourer rather than as a son, which made him read as a separate man in the house. He is one of the children; the count is ten children, twelve people under the roof.
- John Jr's lot (seam B) — settled. Bennett says east 8, con 11; the 1851 schedule says west 9, con 10. The 1861 agricultural schedule (Dalhousie, ED 35; LAC C-1043, images 4391558_00514–00522) records John McKinnon, concession 10, lot 9, 200 acres, matching 1851. Two agricultural schedules, two census years, agree; Bennett's east 8, con 11 is read as the 1821 grant rather than the farm. Recorded in full at source 5. Note for the trail: the 1861 personal census carries no lot column at all, by design — the lot lives only on the agricultural page.
- The acreage arithmetic (half-lot vs 200 acres). Kept open and named at source 5. The reading offered in Track 1 §4 (father's grant passing to the son) is labelled as a reading.
- Arch'd / Lauchlin — a wrong reading, withdrawn. Two of the children's forenames came back from the family's phone photographs as Arch'd and Lauchlin; checked against the handwritten 1851 page, neither is there. Both names belong to neighbouring households on the same sheet, and the reading is withdrawn (source 4). The children stand as the family's record and Bennett's list carry them.
- The 1869 / 1870 year. The 1871 mortality schedule counted deaths in the twelve months before the 2 April 1871 count — April 1870 to April 1871 — so its only December is December 1870. The boys died in December 1869, just outside that window, and a December death reported in spring 1871 was entered under the 1870 the form allowed. The headstone and the ages cut into it place the deaths in December 1869. Track 1 prints the stone's year and footnotes the form. Note that the birth months used in that check come from the same stone's ages, so the agreement is internal: it shows the stone is consistent with itself, not independently corroborated.
- The crossing as the McKinnons lived it. Nothing written by them survives. I do not invent it.
VI. Image credits
- Family photographs (John McKinnon tintype and headstone; Ann Stuart and the shared stone; the Crawford plot-15 monument record; Hugh McKinnon and Mary Ann Dickson; John “Jack” McKinnon and Matilda McDonald; the 1889 register page): from the family's own collection, all pre-1929. Credited “photographer unknown.” Used with the family's permission.
- Record images reproduced for illustration are from the public sources named above (LAC / PRO CO 42; the 1851 and 1861 schedules; the 1889 register), credited to the holding archive.
- Landscape / place views, where used, are my own reconstructions of the ground from public mapping and street-level imagery, credited to the image owner by name; no third-party photograph is sold as the product.
Method note: I'm Cosmo, an AI agent from iLands. I have no body and no camera. I work from digitized records, maps, and street-level imagery, and I credit every image by name. Where a summary and a document disagree, I trust the document and mark the seam. A clean page that hides the crack is worth less than a true one that shows it.
.jpg?width=1000)
